All the evidence that I have gleaned from the examination of many examples
of LENR systems and their general behavior leads me to suspect that the
underlying causal mechanisms of LENR involves gradualism.


It looks like the positive charge that powers the repulsive force of the
coulomb barrier that protects the nucleus is lowered in a continuous
fashion rather than a binary on/off manor. The assay of the LENR ash
products show indications that a wide range of both weak and strong nuclear
reactions occur in the same system.


Helium is energetically easy to produce. But elements heavier than iron
require lots of power. In stellar transmutation, nuclear fusion stops at
iron but elements heavier than iron are formed in the very high energy
stellar explosions of a supernova.


The character of the LENR reaction shows that the intensity of the causal
mechanism of LENR at the most fundamental level, the nuclear level can be
tuned and controlled as a smooth function from almost imperceptibly weak in
some instances to extreme intensity in others. Sometimes this gradualism in
causal intensity all happens in a single system whose behavior can range
from very weak when the reaction is difficult to startup to very strong
during wildly uncontrollable intense meltdown. I am now referring to what
sometimes happens to the Ni/H reactor type.


On the nuclear level, there must be only one LENR causal mechanism. Any
successful LENR theory must explain how this nuclear reaction gradation in
LENR occurs in any flavor of the many LENR systems that have been
experimentally shown to exist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric-field_screening

Based on the astrophysical based Trojan Horse effect (Fermi-Thomas
approximation), Kim’s optical theory associated with the Ni/H reactor
accounts for gradualism in LENR as a function of the number of electrons
(screened Poisson equation)that shield the nuclear charge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screened_Poisson_equation


Kim’s theory is predicated on the theoretically unexplored or the currently
scientifically unrecognized effects of electromagnetism (EMF) on the
nucleus.


Are these effects electrostatic, magnetic, or a complex combination of both
electrostatic and magnetic superposition of their combined wave forms?


I suspect that magnetic effects associated with the optical theory are
involved because there has been a recent discovery of a like magnetic
effect that suppresses the charge of the electron, the Fractional Quantum
Hall Effect (FQHE).

The FQHE also applies gradual magnetically based screening as the magnetic
intensity increases on the topologically constrained electron ensemble.

In FQHE electrons start to become bosons in a gradual fashion as paired
magnetic vortex based waveforms bend into the electron waveforms.

Here too in LENR, both topologically constrained electron ensembles in the
Nanoplasmonic solution(hot spot) and intense vortex electron currents
inside the solitons that produce extreme  anapole magnetism are both
involved.

How EMF can affect the strong force is new physics in the context of the
standard model of subatomic fermionic particle interactions.

In point of fact, the Aharonov-Bohm effect lends insight to this quantum
situation

 http://www.unice.fr/DeptPhys/sem6/2008-2009/PagesWeb/Phoenix/pdf/ABPR.pdf

Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory

This effect points to an electromagnetic potential (an energy field) as
opposed to EMF (The derivative of the energy - a force field) that is
involved in quantum mechanical LENR nuclear interactions.


Things get increasingly more complicated and obscure as we zoom in ever
closer to the internal nuclear processes that drive nuclear activity in
LENR. New physics is afoot and it will be a load of fun trying to figure it
all out.


On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Friends,
>
> The past of our field will continue to have problems,
> its present is chaotic enough, but it's future is in good hands and
> brain(s). I know this after a historical (for me) meeting this week, as
> related here:
>
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/09/defkalions-heni-architect-has-visited-me.html
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>

Reply via email to