Wouldn't it be lovely to know for sure if CNT are indeed part of the E-Cat secret?
***By CNT I think you mean CarbonNanoTubes. I doubt they are integral to Rossi's secret. Rossi didn't have the background. Focardi said that his major contribution was separating H2 gas into monoatomic H1 gas before loading up the metal lattice. He probably used Tungsten at first, then switched to electrical fields, and has tried all kinds of things. The latest generation of ECat seems to use AC fields. That's his "secret". What happened after he got success using this approach is his own IP. He has had more time on point with working LENR cells than anyone else in the last 10 years because he got the effect to be more easily reproducible. The temptation for every tinkerer at that point is to go into production as fast as possible. Rossi is much more a tinkerer than a theorist. If Rossi had a viable theory, he'd have made more progress. But he has been in a position no one else has been: He has been able to experimentally disprove all the theories out there. So when he said to Krivit that it looked more like Electron Capture than the Small Nuclear Force, he was in a position to know when no one else was. Krivit, being all-in for the Widom-Larson theory, immediately started talking Rossi down as a fraud. In the end, I think a vibrating 1Dimensional BEC (or 1DLL) along with a combination of theories will finally prove out. LENR will be a complicated theoretical phenomena. On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > > *From:* Kevin O'Malley > > > > My conjecture would be due to the skin effect. If you can get a > superconducting effect on the outer skin, Electrical Fields might push the > H1 monoatomic atoms further into the substrate. > > > > I'm not even sure you need a full superconducting effect. Containment > alone, to reduce freedom move movement - could be adequate. > > > > Wouldn't it be lovely to know for sure if CNT are indeed part of the E-Cat > secret? > > > > Jones >
