No, unfortunately I'm not that well read. But since it was suggested that we should be calling this something other than BEC, a 1D Luttinger Liquid sounds good to me -- the 1DLL theory...
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:27 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]>wrote: > I think this is where Kevin got his theory! Even if he was not > consciously aware of it… > > J > > > > Jan 23, 2014 > > Quantum physics in 1-D: New experiment supports long-predicted 'Luttinger > liquid' model > > http://phys.org/news/2014-01-quantum-physics-d-long-predicted-luttinger.html > > “In 1950, Japanese Nobel Prize winner Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, followed by > American physicist Joaquin Mazdak Luttinger in 1963, came up with a > mathematical model showing that the effects of one particle on all others > in a one-dimensional line would be much greater than in two- or > three-dimensional spaces. Among quantum physicists, this model came to be > known as the "Luttinger liquid" state.” > > > > -mark iverson > > > > > > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Sunday, January 26, 2014 11:13 AM > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:"energy driven superconductivity" and IR coherence > for LENR > > > > Very interesting Kevin. > > > > This could be especially relevant if the tubes in question are shown to be > a composite, made with graphite fibers, or CNT. > > > > The inside of a carbon nanotube would seem to favor a single line of dense > hydrogen. > > > > The hydrogen may technically not need to be 1-D so much as to have an > extreme ratio of length to diameter. > > > > *From:* Kevin O'Malley > > > > ***I have a theory to propose. It could be a one dimensional BEC rather > than 3 dimensional. By that, I mean that there's a BEC forming along a > single line of atoms (1dimensional), not along a plane (2dimensional) nor > in a cube (3dimensional). So it's a partial BEC. > > > > >
