http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/7
Viewpoint: Statistical flickers in a Bose-Einstein Condensate of Photons The members of a BEC do not need to be in the ground state, they just need to be identical and whatever state they rise to.. These members can be created and destroyed without affecting the viability of the BEC as long as the creation rate is greater than the destruction rate. BEC is maintained in a polariton condensate through the exchange of photons among the polariton groups(hot spots called NAE). This is analogous to how a collection of metronomes are synced by vibration exchange on a platform. On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Well kudos to Kevin nevertheless for bringing it up. > > > > There is a very important advantage for the 1-D state for achieving any > kind of high temperature coherence with the least effort and highest > probability. In fact it is the only alternative, isn’t it? > > > > Since we cannot by definition achieve the lowest quantum state for all of > the quantum phenomena, and we are trying to align these to the same higher > state – then even with the simplicity of the f/H boson (hydrogen DDL) being > the target boson – there is no reasonable possibility except 1-D due to > restricted freedom of movement. IOW it is only possible to align all of the > necessary parameters for achieving even temporary coherence if the string > of particles is encased within a structure which constrains freedom of > movement to one dimension only. > > > > A CNT can do that. > > > > *From:* MarkI-ZeroPoint > > Another excerpt from the article… > > > > To scientists, "what is so fascinating and elegant about quantum physics > in one dimension is that the solutions are mathematically exact," Gervais > adds. "In most other cases, the solutions are only approximate.” > > > > -mark > > > > *From:* MarkI-ZeroPoint > > > > I think this is where Kevin got his theory! Even if he was not > consciously aware of it… > > J > > > > Jan 23, 2014 > > Quantum physics in 1-D: New experiment supports long-predicted 'Luttinger > liquid' model > > http://phys.org/news/2014-01-quantum-physics-d-long-predicted-luttinger.html > > “In 1950, Japanese Nobel Prize winner Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, followed by > American physicist Joaquin Mazdak Luttinger in 1963, came up with a > mathematical model showing that the effects of one particle on all others > in a one-dimensional line would be much greater than in two- or > three-dimensional spaces. Among quantum physicists, this model came to be > known as the "Luttinger liquid" state.” > > > > -mark iverson > > > > > > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Sunday, January 26, 2014 11:13 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:"energy driven superconductivity" and IR coherence > for LENR > > > > Very interesting Kevin. > > > > This could be especially relevant if the tubes in question are shown to be > a composite, made with graphite fibers, or CNT. > > > > The inside of a carbon nanotube would seem to favor a single line of dense > hydrogen. > > > > The hydrogen may technically not need to be 1-D so much as to have an > extreme ratio of length to diameter. > > > > *From:* Kevin O'Malley > > > > ***I have a theory to propose. It could be a one dimensional BEC rather > than 3 dimensional. By that, I mean that there's a BEC forming along a > single line of atoms (1dimensional), not along a plane (2dimensional) nor > in a cube (3dimensional). So it's a partial BEC. > > > > >
