Another excerpt from the article.
To scientists, "what is so fascinating and elegant about quantum physics in one dimension is that the solutions are mathematically exact," Gervais adds. "In most other cases, the solutions are only approximate." -mark From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:"energy driven superconductivity" and IR coherence for LENR I think this is where Kevin got his theory! Even if he was not consciously aware of it. J Jan 23, 2014 Quantum physics in 1-D: New experiment supports long-predicted 'Luttinger liquid' model http://phys.org/news/2014-01-quantum-physics-d-long-predicted-luttinger.html "In 1950, Japanese Nobel Prize winner Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, followed by American physicist Joaquin Mazdak Luttinger in 1963, came up with a mathematical model showing that the effects of one particle on all others in a one-dimensional line would be much greater than in two- or three-dimensional spaces. Among quantum physicists, this model came to be known as the "Luttinger liquid" state." -mark iverson From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 11:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:"energy driven superconductivity" and IR coherence for LENR Very interesting Kevin. This could be especially relevant if the tubes in question are shown to be a composite, made with graphite fibers, or CNT. The inside of a carbon nanotube would seem to favor a single line of dense hydrogen. The hydrogen may technically not need to be 1-D so much as to have an extreme ratio of length to diameter. From: Kevin O'Malley ***I have a theory to propose. It could be a one dimensional BEC rather than 3 dimensional. By that, I mean that there's a BEC forming along a single line of atoms (1dimensional), not along a plane (2dimensional) nor in a cube (3dimensional). So it's a partial BEC.
