I agree with QED. We humans live in a weakly ionizing quantum vacuum, which varies in concentration in our atmosphere, creating low pressure disturbances and is conductive. Based upon observation, it is ionizing oxygen in our atmosphere and forming water vapor as well as weakly ionizing the water/ocean at times and triggering blooms and hypoxia. It is probably the ionization energy behind photosynthesis.
This dark matter streams from the Sun, goes through inflation forming strings in our atmosphere which are decaying all of the time creating our weather in the jet streams and streaming to the core of the Earth, weakly interacting on humans and the Earth in a weakly ionizing effect we call gravity. That is my Macro explanation of something that is quantum in Nature Stewart On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > From: Jed Rothwell > AA: The cold fusion reaction must be the > same for all systems if we look deep enough. > JB: That is absurd. There is not the least bit of evidence > for that proposition. In fact, the evidence points to perhaps a dozen > energetic reactions of hydrogen when loaded into condensed matter. > JR: There may be no evidence for this, but it seems likely > based on what McKubre calls the conservation of miracles. > > First off - LENR is no miracle. We are at the stage of adequate proof. The > past irregularity in the Lab, of finding any LENR reaction at all - is > still > with us, Rossi notwithstanding. But that irregularity in itself is > indicative of there being many energetic pathways of variable probability. > As is Mills and the extraordinary variety of findings of transmutation or > no > transmutation, helium-e or tritium or helium-4 etc. > > Second, there is nothing in physics related to the silly notion of > "conservation of miracles". It is merely a reflection of the ignorance of > the observer. > > Thirdly, hydrogen makes up most of the Universe - perhaps 90% of what we > can > see, and up to 99% of all mass, if dark matter is hydrogen in a DDL (deep > Dirac level). Thus, it could be opined that if there were such a parameter > as "miracles" (inherent ignorance) then the vast majority of those should > be > relate to hydrogen. > > In short, a dozen different versions of LENR could be on the low side :-) > > You can compare this to combustion, which works differently > with different materials. Sometimes it produces smoke; sometimes it > doesn't. > Sometimes it is rapid in an explosion, sometimes slow. As Chris Tinsley > often pointed out, taking a broader view, you can even say that metabolism > is a form of combustion. > QED > > >
