Bob Higgins--Bob Cook here--

I agree with your logic regarding 100% efficient fractionating as possible.  As 
I noted in an earlier comment Mosier-Boss etal at SPAWAR saw two separate 
reactions, the one LENR with no radiation being D-D going to He-4.  It was also 
the dominant reaction that happened in their Pd-D unshielded cell.  

Bob
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob Higgins 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Cc: Bob Higgins 
  Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 5:23 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:MIT Course Day 5 -- NiH Systems


  I am not going to try to quote who and what from this thread regarding 
fractionating gammas (too long of a story line now).  


  What I have come to believe and what I initially missed, and what I think 
many Vorts may be missing in this, is that the LENR reaction and the 
fractionating are not two separate processes.  Jones (et al) are correct that 
if there is a fractionating mechanism that is an independent effect, it could 
not be 100% efficient and some high energy photons would escape as a marker of 
this inefficiency.  


  The important possibility to realize is that the fractionating and the LENR 
are both part of the SAME mechanism.  There can be no leaks because without the 
fractionating mechanism operating, there would not be any LENR.  On each pair 
of hydrons, the fractionating mechanism is required to allow the nuclear 
reaction to occur.  This guarantees no leakage, except for secondary effects.


  So in this scenario, 100% efficient fractionating is possible.


  Bob Higgins 





Reply via email to