Ed--
You said:
>>Yes, that is what I'm saying. LENR can not result in a single alpha because
>>two particles are required to conserve momentum when energy is released. <<
I note that, if there is no linear momentum to start, two particles would not
be required. I do not believe conservation of angular momentum requires two
particles either. And keep in mind that potential energy may be changed to the
energy of angular momentum/spin energy in LENR.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Edmund Storms
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper"
On Mar 5, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Edmund Storms
Jones, bremsstrahlung or "slowing down radiation" is not
produced by photons.
Who said it was?
I'm not answering a claim. I'm simply giving information. You brought up
photons by talking about gamma emissions, which are photons. You then added the
production of bremsstrahlung, which I simply pointed out is not produced by
gamma.
You brought up photons. I asked for adequate documentation
of intense photon emission - and am still waiting.
I sent a list of references. If you want a copy of a particular paper to
read, ask and I will send what I have. Unfortunately, I can not send using
Vortex and I can not send all the papers.
This is generated by energetic electrons or particles such
as alpha emission. LENR produces neither kind of radiation.
What? Are you now saying that the helium you claim to see in Pd-D does not
begin as an alpha particles?
Yes, that is what I'm saying. LENR can not result in a single alpha because
two particles are required to conserve momentum when energy is released.
Therefore, bremsstrahlung is not an issue because all the
mass-energy is dissipated as photons.
There is no proof of this.
The proof is in the behavior. This is the only conclusion consistent with all
behavior. Unfortunately, a book is required to present this information in a
form and as complete as you require. I'm attempting to do this. Please be
patient.
The only question is how this happens. I have proposed a
mechanism. The only issue is whether this mechanism is plausible and
consistent will all the other observations.
It is not plausible if you cannot document photons sufficient to account for
the heat.
I agree, the measurement of heat and radiation have not been done in a way to
show a quantitative correlation. However, I suggest you apply this standard to
the other explanations as well. If you do, I think you will have to agree that
no explanation meeting this requirements presently exists, including your own.
Ed Storms
Where is the documentation?
Jones
<winmail.dat>
