My sense is that the transmutation process is dependent on the geometry of the surface that the LENR reaction is produced by. There are many types of such surface geometries that are capable of producing the LENR effect and therefore there are many types of transmutation mechanisms possible among the various classes of LENR experiments.
The false assumption that underlie this discussion is that LENR must always produce helium. This assumption may be valid in a particular narrow class of LENR experiments, by invalid in another class of experiments because of the geometric surface characteristics of the particular class of experiments. At the end of the day, LENR and its associated ash production is based on the particular geometry of the surface that is producing the ash. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Parts per million is the limit of acceptable levels for accuracy. Sure >> there are few labs in the world that can possibly do better, but we are >> talking about cold fusion researchers with self-made gadgets and most of >> this work was done a decade ago. >> > > I missed that gem. No, we are not talking about self-made gadgets. We are > talking about three of the world's best facilities for measuring helium: U. > Texas, Rockwell International, and the U.S. Bureau of Mines. That was > stated by Miles, by me and by others many times. Has Jones Beene read > nothing? Or does he think that world-class experts at leading labs do not > know the characteristics of their own instruments, and they cannot > distinguish between parts per billion and per million? > > - Jed > >
