Alysson Troffer wrote: > Other (faster) approval mechanisms need to be developed for well-defined > types of change. For example, the content of the RSS-fed sections change > rapidly without overview. >
I put those words there as a reminder, not Alan. My point was simply that many parts of the site change rapidly with no review - and that is OK. This implies that there should be a related low-bar low latency path thru the "I want to change something on the site" process. The ARC carves out a path called self-review, sets up boundaries for its use and delegates to the various developers the responsibility and authority to use that path to make changes without any other review oversight. (Note that this is even lighter weight than the fasttrack process, which says "I'm going to do <this> unless someone objects in the next week".) In the end, the WebEditorialBoard needs to figure out what web things qualify for that level of delegated review. -John _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
