Simon Phipps wrote: > On Apr 2, 2008, at 18:13, Alan Burlison wrote: >> The OGB clearly has the right to suggest modifications to any proposal >> that is put to it. What is not reasonable is if it modifies the >> proposal and then votes on it without giving the proposer(s) a chance to >> discuss the modifications. That's what happened in this case. > > The OGB voted yesterday to move to e-mail voting for as much business as > possible, so I hope this circumstance can be avoided in future. In > addition, we decided to revisit the website editorial board. John > Plocher will be building a resolution for discussion, and your input > would be most welcome, Alan.
Thanks. John has already contacted me, and I've passed the discussion over to the members of the Website project as I'm not a Project Leader of that project any longer, although I'm more than happy to help out in whatever way I can. -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
