Alan Coopersmith wrote: > When the OGB voted to create it without the final editorial authority that > had already been vested in the website review committee, the main proponent > declared that he refused to accept our decision was valid, that the OGB had > no right to modify a proposal - only accept or reject it, and resigned his > core > contributorship in all other communities in protest, and as I recall, we were > told all the other proposed community members agreed that they did not want > the > community group under those terms, so it was left to die stillborn.
The OGB clearly has the right to suggest modifications to any proposal that is put to it. What is not reasonable is if it modifies the proposal and then votes on it without giving the proposer(s) a chance to discuss the modifications. That's what happened in this case. -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
