Hi John, Thanks for the clarification.
My understanding is that this board/committee is responsible for the common pages on opensolaris.org. Are you referring to elements on the common pages that only need the kind of "self-review" that you describe? I'm trying to get my head around the scope of responsibility that we have. I'm also thinking that some changes might require more than a "+1" or "-1" vote. What if we agree in principle with a suggested change but would like to suggest some tweaks? How do we handle that? Alysson John Plocher wrote: > Alysson Troffer wrote: > >> Other (faster) approval mechanisms need to be developed for >> well-defined >> types of change. For example, the content of the RSS-fed sections >> change >> rapidly without overview. >> > > > I put those words there as a reminder, not Alan. > > My point was simply that many parts of the site change rapidly > with no review - and that is OK. This implies that there should > be a related low-bar low latency path thru the "I want to change > something on the site" process. > > The ARC carves out a path called self-review, sets up boundaries > for its use and delegates to the various developers the > responsibility and authority to use that path to make changes > without any other review oversight. (Note that this is even > lighter weight than the fasttrack process, which says "I'm > going to do <this> unless someone objects in the next week".) > > In the end, the WebEditorialBoard needs to figure out what > web things qualify for that level of delegated review. > > -John _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
