That's all well and good, Ellen, but in traditional Jewish law, you 
would never be allowed to ask for a divorce; only your husband 
could.  My parents were married by an Orthodox rabbi in Israel, and 
when my parents separated, she could file the civil proceedings, but 
she had to wait several years for my dad to pursue a "get" (he 
finally decided he wanted to remarry).  The way she describes it, it 
was a pretty humiliating experience, down to my (alchoholic, 
abusive) father claiming she was an unfit wife and mother and 
spitting on her.

Before getting married in a Catholic church, the couple has to 
undergo mandatory pre-marriage counseling.  Basically, the church 
takes marriage seriously, and wants to do everything to encourage 
couples to only enter the sacrament if they can stick it out, 
therefore making divorce unnecessary.



--- In [email protected], "Ellen" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jewish divorce isn't perfect by any means, but at least it exists. 
> BTW at least originally you didn't have to have a legitimate 
reason 
> to get divorced.  You just told your wife you were getting a 
divorce 
> and that was it. Met someone you liked better?  No problem.  I 
think 
> there should be a happy medium between no divorce for any reason, 
any 
> divorce for no reason, but I would take the Jewish process as the 
> lesser of 2 evils.  
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Max H." <MaxH42@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > I have found the use/interpretation of the Get by some Chasidic 
and
> > Lubavicher communities to be as hostile towards women as the 
> practices of
> > many other fundamentalist religions. I think the difference is 
> that, as far
> > as I am aware, those two sects don't hold significant political 
> power over
> > any non-believers anywhere in the world, so their beliefs only 
hold 
> sway
> > over their adherents, as opposed to some certain fundamentalist 
> Christian,
> > Muslim, and Hindu sects.
> > 
> > -Max
> > 
> > On 6/21/07, Ellen <ellengoodman6@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Joe Kennedy II's annulment of his first marriage was reversed 
11
> > > years after the divorce, and he has since remarried. in the 
eyes 
> of
> > > the church he is still married to his first wife apparently. 
What 
> is
> > > the deal with Catholics and divorce?  Jews have had divorce no
> > > problem since the religion began as far as I can tell.  
Granted it
> > > hasn't always been equitable between genders and there has to 
be
> > > legitimate reasons, but it's better than it being completely
> > > forbidden.  Is it because if a divorced person remarries they 
are 
> no
> > > longer a virgin and therefore somehow sinful?  Is it a sin to 
> realize
> > > after the fact that you married the wrong person or that you 
> simply
> > > grew apart?  Annulment says the marriage was flawed from the
> > > beginning.  If you get divorced after 10 or 15 years that 
probably
> > > wasn't the case.  I apologize for my naivete, but I truly 
don't 
> get
> > > it.  I guess because my religion's take is so totally 
different.
> > > Jews are like, so you had sex with someone else before you met 
me.
> > > That's cool, no problem.  You filled out the official 
paperwork to
> > > end it, that's all that matters.
> > >
> > > This is serious stuff--if you get a divorce but not an 
annulment 
> in
> > > Catholicism and you remarry you are basically committing bigamy
> > > apparently.  No sacraments, no communion, etc.  Can someone 
please
> > > enlighten me as to the underlying reason for this?  Thank you.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to