On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 3:32 PM, duanyao <duan...@ustc.edu> wrote:
> So you mean file: protocol is not portable? For absolute file: url, true;
> for relative url, almost not true.
> When writing web pages, no one use absolute file: urls in practice, so this
> is a non-issue.

Neither is portable or part of the web, since you don't allocate
resources on someone else their machine that way. (And even in the
sense that you mean it, they're not portable due to the different
styles of matching, case-insensitive, Unicode normalization, custom
variants of Unicode normalization, bytes vs code points, etc.)


Reply via email to