> It sure seems that sessions are used heavily, but i knew that anyway, > from documentation. >
I don't think that sessions are used heavily compared to other web-apps. The difference is that Wicket does most of the Sessions tasks for you and it is consistent whereas with Struts etc you end up doing everything yourself. From my experience, many web-apps end up with much worse session usage as it is a developers tasks compared to a similar Wicket app. In Wicket, we try to keep the developer in control, but most standard session use case are already in place. Overall and IMO it makes Session handling and usage much saver in the long run. I don't have hard figures, but I think that Wicket web apps don't use more session memory than any other normal web-app (no matter which framework) which implements the same business functionality. Of course there are always well-tuned apps which do it better, but I think Wicket does a decent job for most use cases. Juergen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
