Daniel - this distinction between facts vs claims -- is happy bullshit merely meant to calm the masses. A claim is a fact and a fact is a claim. It is the existence of PROVENANCE data in the Wikidata data model that distinguishes the two tools. Provenance data is at the heart of the web-of-trust, the top rung of the Internet architecture promulgated by the W3. So, if your view is that SMW is not for provenance data, while Wikidata is for provenance data, then how can I NOT conclude SMW is down-version? Why would I not TOSS SMW for Wikidata since they BOTH handle structured data? BOTH share a property: namespace? BOTH share code modules? BOTH have data-input (cf Semantic Form Inputs)? BOTH have formatted output (cf Semantic Result Formats).
:(this is what I was trying to communicate to Lydia in another note) Provenance data certainly is important! It should be built in to an environment that rationalizes & integrates SMW, Dublin Core, and Topic Maps. See the [[meta:Wikitopics]] proposal for my first cut. You make an interesting statement, "SMW one day could utilize _OUR NEW METHOD_ of storing structured data directly, without wikitext, but using it's own, simpler data model." -- friend, this is messianic at best if not confirmation of my dark concerns John On 13.06.2012 09:31, Daniel Kinzler wrote: > On 13.06.2012 18:04, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > >> Ok then let me define it more clearly. Wikidata's clear goal is to serve the Wikipedias. Use in other contexts will also be possible and encouraged but Wikipedia is the main target. It is for a project that values references for all the structured data and it is supposed to serve a multi-language audience. SMW is well established and used in professional and non-professional projects outside of Wikipedia. It usually serves smaller wikis and has quite some use in companies for their internal knowledge management. Obviously there is overlap but in the end the projects are distinct enough to co-exist just fine. Markus wrote a long email about this here: http://www.mail-archive.com/semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03369.html [1] > > I'd like to expand on that a bit. Basically, the main difference to me is: > > * SMW is for managing primary data, i.e. *facts*: "server X is located in room 123" > > * Wikidata is for managing *claims* as we find them on Wikipedia: "according to > report X published in 2005, the population of China in 2004 was 12345678, +/- > 1000, including Taiwan" > > So, Wikidata's data model is much more complex, and aimed at the type of > information we typically see on Wikipedia. This allows is to provide extremely > fine grained provenance data, but makes reasoning and querying a lot harder. It > also means that mapping it to RDF is complex and awkward, not nearly as straight > forward as it is with SMW. > > So, if you are working with factual data and want to do complex queries, use > SMW. If you have data which requires deep provenance information and are content > with simple queries, use Wikidata (resp Wikibase). > > However, we are working to make SMW and Wikibase (the Wikidata software) > compatible where it makes sense: we want to share code for unit conversion, > result formatting, etc. And I could imagine (but that's just a vague idea) that > SMW one day could utilize our new method of storing structured data directly, > without wikitext, but using it's own, simpler data model. > > Anyway, keep in mind that Wikidata is build by the same people who initiated > SMW! They are very well aware of the similarities and the differences. And we > believe that the target audience for SMW and Wikidata *is* quite different. > > -- daniel > > -- > Daniel Kinzler, Softwarearchitekt > > Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin > http://wikimedia.de | Tel. (030) 219 158 260 > > Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. > Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg > unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt > für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l Links: ------ [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03369.html
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
