Hi David, Patricia, Leigh, Steve & Patricia

I agree -- rich text editing will lower the barriers of entry for
newbies to WikiEducator as well as other initiatives using Mediawiki
software.

Dave wrote:

>> Are there any plans to change the way in which wiki-editing occurs?

Yes -- we are very keen to see rich text editing implemented. In fact
this was one of the topics discussed during the Tectonic Shift Think
Tank meeting (http://www.wikieducator.org/Tectonic_shift_think_tank)
where we started mapping out a road map for refining MediaWiki
software for educational purposes. You can view specifics of the
discussion over here:

http://www.wikieducator.org/Tectonic_shift_think_tank/Tech_requirements/Ease_of_use

Mediawiki is a very powerful piece of software -- most notably the
ability for individual users to innovate using the template engine.
The downside of the template engine is that it increases the
complexity for integrating a reliable rich text editor by an order of
magnitude. We're always on the lookout for extra budgetary funding to
invest in the development of these technologies -- its not a trivial
project, but given the demand for rich text editing -- hopefully we
will find a solution sooner rather than later. Any rich text editing
solution for Mediawiki would need to work with all the big Mediawiki
projects like Wikipedia, Wikibooks Wikiversity etc and would need to
scale very well. Wikipedia receives up to 40000 hits per second!
That's food for WikiEducator because we will benefit from a solution
that is both reliable and scalable.

Dave wrote:

>>I realise that the open-office media-wiki text add-on has made this
process significantly easier, but it's still a jump for the general
populace.

Not an ideal solution -- but has at least widened the range of options
for new users. One advantage of the OO approach is that educators can
author their first drafts offline. However, they would still need to
understand the basics of the Mediawiki syntax.

Also -- by the middle of next year, Mediawiki will be able to support
output for the Opendoc format. This will enable users to download
collections of content from WIkiEducator and then edit these locally
in their word-processors.   See:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikis_Go_Printable

Leigh wrote:

>>I see that the skills a teacher acquires by learning to
   edit Wikieducator are very transferable skills that may see them
   participating more on other major wiki projects like Wikipedia and
   Wikibooks, or even their own MediaWiki installation AND
>> People like me have become loyal to the MediaWiki.. why is that? I
   used to desire an easier interface, but now I know enough about
MediaWiki to
   get around, I really enjoy that I can work it and that I can
participate on
   other Wikiprojects...

I agree with Leigh, the incidental learning that occurs by engaging in
wiki communities is very powerful. Wiki's are more about community
than technology -- in some respects, acquiring Mediawiki editing
skills and the tacit knowledge of how these communities is a "right-of-
passage" to the dynamic and exciting world of wiki's. That said, I
would love to see this becoming easier over time so more folk can
experience these amazing communities.

David wrote:

>> I have decided to use WikiEducator as the main platform for
building our course.  This means that all of my academic staff will
need to get familiar with the platform.

That's great news! Patricia and I have been running online workshops
to help build capacity in basic wiki editing skills and these seem to
work rather well.

mmmm -- I'm thinking how we can help here. It seems to me that with
the growing number of new users, it would be pretty cool if we could
have a regular training session each month. We could have a place
where newbies could sign up for online training from all over the
world. This is a pretty big project and we would need help from
volunteers to act as facilitators.  Doing the math -- if we can find
12 volunteer facilitators -- we could run at least 12 training
sessions and the loads would not be too onerous. Effectively a
donation of time to assist with two weeks online facilitation.

What do you think?

This is an important issue for our community -- lets see if we can
come up with an interim solution until the rich text editing matures
sufficiently for us to implement this in Mediawiki.

Would appreciate your advice and thoughts on this one.

Cheers
Wayne






--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"WikiEducator" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to