I'm not sure the term "loop" is appropriate. So far, I see little evidence that feedback provided [1] is making any appreciable difference.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Flow On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Marc A. Pelletier <m...@uberbox.org> wrote: > On 09/05/2014 11:12 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote: > > On 25.08.2014 06:07, Marc A. Pelletier wrote: > > FLOW? > > Last I checked, Flow isn't deployed except as experiments in a handful > of places, and is still in active deployment. > > But you're correct that this would constitute a replacement rather than > a new method alongside the old. A long, long overdue and desperately > needed replacement -- but a replacement nonetheless. > > That also explains the very deliberate development and feedback loop. > > -- Marc > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
