It is not just in BBC and numerama, it is all over the web: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Vote_of_no_confidence_on_Arnnon_Geshuri#Press
Bad PR for WMF and WP :-/ To: [email protected] From: [email protected] Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:25:05 +0100 Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Message from Arnnon Geshuri to the Wikimedia Community On 26.01.2016 21:54, Fæ wrote: > Press coverage like the BBC's this evening which leads with Jimmy > Wales' face, have damaged the WMF's reputation and our projects that > rely on "Wikimedia" remaining a trusted name.[1][2] Published today on numerama.com, top digital news web site (2 millions visitors/month and primary information source for people interested in digital liberties, net neutrality, etc.) in France: http://www.numerama.com/business/141371-wikipedia-secoue-par-une-nomination-contestee.html If I remember how WMUK was "treated" by a few WMF representatives during the Bamkin's controversy I can only state that their is a two-tiers evaluation system of this kind or crisis. Emmanuel -- Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline & more * Web: http://www.kiwix.org * Twitter: https://twitter.com/KiwixOffline * more: http://www.kiwix.org/wiki/Communication _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
