On 26.01.2016 21:54, Fæ wrote: > Press coverage like the BBC's this evening which leads with Jimmy > Wales' face, have damaged the WMF's reputation and our projects that > rely on "Wikimedia" remaining a trusted name.[1][2]
Published today on numerama.com, top digital news web site (2 millions visitors/month and primary information source for people interested in digital liberties, net neutrality, etc.) in France: http://www.numerama.com/business/141371-wikipedia-secoue-par-une-nomination-contestee.html If I remember how WMUK was "treated" by a few WMF representatives during the Bamkin's controversy I can only state that their is a two-tiers evaluation system of this kind or crisis. Emmanuel -- Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline & more * Web: http://www.kiwix.org * Twitter: https://twitter.com/KiwixOffline * more: http://www.kiwix.org/wiki/Communication
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
