On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Gnangarra <[email protected]> wrote: > We should be careful in not shaming communities to vote poorly to save > face,
Well, that might be said of any sort of shaming, but we still do it: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2016/Eligibility_Criteria#Overview_Eligibility_Statuses_of_Chapters.2C_Thematic_Organizations.2C_User_Groups_and_Others (Interestingly, it seems that chapters which have been violating their agreements with the WMF for years are still eligible to vote, though I suppose they probably don't.) The alternative to releasing this list is the status quo, in which those who are well-connected enough to have someone share the list with them can know who to canvass. Is this how we want to choose our board? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
