Hi Pine - Thanks for your questions. We set out to measure community appetite for this change, knowing that it is something we share as our Movement's identity and therefore something that needs broad support. On Meta-Wiki, we shared our consultation metrics for assessing that support and/or opposition .
In assessing the positions and comments shared during this 4 month consultation, we noted that 38% of reviewing affiliates explicitly support the branding proposal (almost 2x our goal of 20%). We also measured that just 0.6% (57 people over more than 9,000 reached) of those reached during the consultation explicitly opposed the proposal, which relates to our benchmark that if "less than 20% oppose, we will consider the proposal to have strong support." Hence the language used in our recommendation. We will add the overall response metrics to Meta to document these outcomes. Many of the reviewing parties identified things they would need to see within a new brand system to consider it for approval and adoption. That's what this next phase of collaboration allows! yours, - Zack  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_research_and_planning/project_summary#Response_KPIs Measure community appetite for change 20% of affiliates support Less than 20% of informed community oppose ✓ 38% of reviewing affiliates support ✓ 0.6% of informed oppose (57 users oppose of ~9,000 reached) On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:19 PM Diane Ranville <dranville-...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I agree with Pine. > There is a majority of people who actually oppose the rebranding > proposition. > I don't quite understand why this is still going forward (except that it is > difficult to acknowledge a mistake and take steps backwards - but it is > sometimes necessary). > Have other options even been considered? > > -speaking in my own name here- > > Diane > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 7:35 AM Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello Zack, > > > > Thank you for the report on Meta. > > > > I am troubled by your statement in this email that "There is considerable > > support for the brand proposal and general appetite to improve our > > movement’s branding system." What that statement appears to omit is that, > > according to the report on Meta, there is also considerable opposition to > > the rebranding proposal. > > > > > > Can you explain why you characterized the proposal as having > "considerable > > support" without in the same sentence acknowledging what appears to be > > considerable opposition? > > > > > > Of the three top-level metrics that the report on Meta displays that > > measure community and affiliate support or opposition regarding the > > rebranding proposal, one of the three metrics is in favor and two of the > > three metrics are opposed. If this was an RfC, and I was using those > > measures of sentiment to evaluate support and opposition regarding the > RfC, > > I would probably close the current rebranding proposal as declined. > > > > Pine > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 20:49 Zack McCune <zmcc...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > > > > *Summary* - We want your help with a voluntary, OPT-IN design process > for > > > movement branding. Please join the in-depth discussion group, or watch > > for > > > updates on Meta-Wiki. > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > After 4 months of community consultation, spanning dozens of > affiliates, > > > several mailing lists, community conferences, and Meta-Wiki, I am > pleased > > > to share a summary of feedback on the proposed 2030 movement brand > > strategy > > > . > > > > > > From more than 319 comments, representing 150 individual contributors > and > > > 63 affiliates, we assessed 6 major themes in feedback: > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > Reducing confusion > > > 2. > > > > > > Protecting reputation > > > 3. > > > > > > Supporting sister projects > > > 4. > > > > > > Addressing (legal, governmental) risks > > > 5. > > > > > > Supporting movement growth > > > 6. > > > > > > The process of change > > > > > > Please visit our feedback summary page to learn more . You will see > > > examples of comments within each section, along with a rough indication > > of > > > how many of the comments that we received were related to each theme. > > > > > > The comments sometimes contradict one another, showing that across our > > wide > > > movement’s experience, different points of view are common (and a sign > of > > > health!). To visualize these tensions, we have created “polarity maps” > > > which are used to help visualize how different arguments coexist in > > tension > > > with each other. > > > > > > Ultimately, the comments provided from you all are very thoughtful and > > > useful guidance on what is needed to make our movement’s branding > > > successful. One can read the 6 themes above as “criteria” for assessing > > > branding systems. > > > > > > == Thanks == > > > > > > I would like to thank the organizers of Iberoconf, Wikipedia Education > > > Summit, and the Wikimedia Summit for inviting us to hold discussions > > during > > > their sessions. I would also like to thank my colleagues Elena Lappen, > > > Samir Elsharbaty, and Blanca Flores who conducted extensive parts of > this > > > consultation. To the hundreds of people, and dozens of affiliates > > > commenting, thank you for reviewing the proposal and offering your > > > perspectives and insights. > > > > > > > > > == Next steps and staying involved == > > > > > > There is considerable support for the brand proposal and general > appetite > > > to improve our movement’s branding system. Further, we believe that > > > critical feedback on the proposal offers direct guidance for precisely > > what > > > branding must do to be successful for our movement. We have shared > these > > > insights and our proposed continuance with the Board of Trustees, who > > > approved continuing these efforts. > > > > > > Acting on community insights, we will be collaborating on formal brand > > > naming, visual identity, and brand system design that will use > > “Wikipedia” > > > as the central reference point. The resulting system will be OPT-IN for > > > affiliates. > > > > > > This design process will be guided by a “brand network” – a group of > > > volunteers who would like to continue advising on brand during this > > > consultation. Dozens of people have already volunteered, and we invite > > you > > > to join the group. We will use a group on Wikimedia Space to host this > > > discussion and the group will be closed to allow candid discussions and > > > room for iterations. EVERYONE IS INVITED TO JOIN . If you do not > want > > to > > > commit to the in-depth, longer term discussions that will be happening > > > within the brand network group, we will still be tracking comments left > > on > > > the project’s Meta-Wiki page . Furthermore, all important ideas and > > > updates originating from the brand network discussion will be shared > > > publicly to mailing lists and Meta-Wiki. > > > > > > The development of this proposed identity system will take > approximately > > 6 > > > months. As stated, regular updates will be shared to mailing lists, > > > Wikimedia Space, and Meta-Wiki . Please engage us where you are most > > > comfortable! Once complete, community groups will have the power to > > decide > > > if/when they opt in to using the new system. > > > > > > Yours, > > > > > > Zack > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2019/02/26/leading-with-wikipedia-a-brand-proposal-for-2030/ > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_research_and_planning/community_review/results > > > > > > > > >  https://discuss-space.wmflabs.org/g/brand-network and click the > gray > > > "Request" button. When your request is approved, you will be able to > see > > > and access the brand network discussion category on the Discuss Space > > main > > > page. > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_research_and_planning > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Zack McCune (he/him) > > > > > > Director of Brand > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> -- Zack McCune (he/him) Director of Brand Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>