The credit is not wrong, but possibly somewhat incomplete. As you well know, 
much of the content of Wikimedia has more than one author and it is common 
knowledge that all of the content of Wikimedia is published as CC-BY-SA or 
GFDL. In the case of many authors attribution is often difficult. (In the US 
copyright can even be attributed to an institution – e.g. Wikimedia – rather 
than a person.)

 

So, yes, it is desirable, that the license and the author are attributed 
appropriately and I am sure, that Bruno will do so soon, after having read your 
kind reminder.

 

The example also shows, that it is highly desirable, that all such licensing 
information be embedded in the (Dublin core) metadata of such a file. Then it 
will travel with the object. I vote for adding that to the list of best 
practices.

 

In Switzerland we have by law the right of quotation – also applicable to 
images! And in this respect the quoted website has behaved just like any other 
newspaper or media in Switzerland (e.g. the NZZ), by citing the source.

 

So, please!, let us not act like the copyright lobby and tear each other to 
pieces internally!!

 

Hartwig Thomas

Digitale Allmend (Legal and Public Lead of Creative Commons Licenses)

 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ludovic Péron
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:01 PM
To: Mailing list for Wikimedia CH
Subject: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

 

Hi,

 

I found this web 
<http://www.bjinstitute.org/newsmessage/reprostationen-des-bj-institutes-fuer-wikipedia/10a20af93816783eefe8480b92b9f042/>
  page on the web site of BJ Institute. 

 

Problem : This image is a CC By SA photography on Commons and the credit is 
wrong (good credit : Charles Andrès - CC By SA). Seeing this on the website of 
one of our partners, which happens to be run by one of our board members, makes 
me especially concerned about our credibility.

 

Me, and some other volunteers of WMCH, spend many times to explain how to use 
correctly free contents. We are discussing with nationals media, with some 
schools, etc. 

 

We (and WMCH) loose our credibility if our contacts see this web page. 

 

So, thanks you to make correction very quickly. 

 

And I think it's necessary that our regular partners will be blameless about 
copyright. May be it's possible to make internal workshops. I am available for 
that. 

 

Regards

 

Ludovic Péron

_______________________________________________
http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website
Wikimediach-l mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l

Antwort per Email an