To cite another example:
states clearly, that the license is CC-BY-SA, but – very unfortunately indeed –
it does not unambiguously attribute the authorship!! Or does “user” mean
So how can one make use of WMCH content, if it is not attributed decently in
the Wikimedia repository?
Whenever the license CC-BY-SA is used, an unambiguous attribution must
accompany it. Otherwise it is to be assumed, that the copyright owner has
relinquished the attribution to Wikimedia.
Please embed licensing information in the metadata!!!
[mailto:wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Ludovic Péron
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:01 PM
To: Mailing list for Wikimedia CH
Subject: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)
I found this web
page on the web site of BJ Institute.
Problem : This image is a CC By SA photography on Commons and the credit is
wrong (good credit : Charles Andrès - CC By SA). Seeing this on the website of
one of our partners, which happens to be run by one of our board members, makes
me especially concerned about our credibility.
Me, and some other volunteers of WMCH, spend many times to explain how to use
correctly free contents. We are discussing with nationals media, with some
We (and WMCH) loose our credibility if our contacts see this web page.
So, thanks you to make correction very quickly.
And I think it's necessary that our regular partners will be blameless about
copyright. May be it's possible to make internal workshops. I am available for
http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website
Wikimediach-l mailing list