----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: Monitor Problem
Vista is supposedly slower than XP & that's on top end machines. I would
expect the gap to be wider on slower machines.
Vista is slower to "catch on" or become accepted for sure. XP handles most
of the typical tasks that the majority of computer users perform and very
well, if it is installed on a computer that performs well. Windows 9x was a
drag and everyone knew it. Millennium gave very little in exchange for the
more resources it required. This is not true of XP. The eyes of XP users
with a high performance computer will not brighten at the thought of Vista
like the eyes of Millennium users brightened when XP was offered.
I just built myself a new Pentium D (yes, it is a leftover that did not sell
and now Core 2 Duo is the current CPU) computer and installed Windows XP
Professional OEM on it. I know Vista is right around the corner. Ho hum! I
am set for another 5+ years!
Chuck
--
----------------------------------------
To Change your email Address for this list, send the following message:
CHANGE WIN-HOME your_old_address your_new_address
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note carefully that both old and new addresses are required.
