I believe the question was "why not"?
Personally, I am quite unhappy about having to shell out more money just to upgrade my
kernel (a small kernel upgrade fee, tho, would be acceptable).
Netraverse would seem to be guilty of "pulling a Microsoft" in the worst way.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:31:32AM -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> As stated by support, W4L 2.0 will NOT be "enhanced, upgraded, patched,
> whatever" to support the 2.4. kernel.
>
> --
> Austin Gonyou
> Systems Architect
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-796-9023
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Win4Lin-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
--
********************************
David William Botsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
********************************
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
