Sheryl,
I am not looking to burn anyone.
If Mike feels in anyway offended by me asking "Whats it gonna cost",
please forgive me. That was never the intention.
The original mail I sent, was simply a question, if Netraverse choose to
answer it is of course entirely up to them.
Why myself ,and others may appear to be quite restless is the change in
policy from Netraverse, with regards beta testing & pricing.
Perhaps a little more openess, which is the at the heart of the linux
community (perhaps you have forgotten) would be very welcome.
Please do not forget that without us, your customer, you would not exist!
Regards,
Grant
On Monday 23 April 2001 21:29, you wrote:
> Grant,
>
> At issue when I posted was not that you weren't entitled to your opinion
> or entitled to the right to wonder - but rather that you were asking Mike
> (who gets the brunt of people's wrath again and again around here) to
> *speculate* on something where, no matter what his answer, you or other
> readers will likely be unhappy with it and will take it out on him. Why
> not just wait for the company to post its upgrade policy and then take
> your complaint to the people who make the decisions? I know that Mike is
> a tireless advocate for customers and faithfully takes their opinions "up
> the ladder". I know this because I work at NeTraverse (system
> administration). I don't think we should take advantage of that by
> asking him to post his conjecture and then either disliking the conjecture
> or trying to use what he posts as opinion to get something different from
> what the company finally offers.
>
> -Sheryl, de-lurking for one day only.
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Grant Williamson wrote:
> > Mark&Sheryl,
> > why I ask, is quite simple, I like a lot of people who have backed
> > Trelos/Netraverse from day one, did not feel that Win4Lin 2.0 was a real
> > 2.x release. You of course are quite entitled to your own opinion.
> >
> > If there is once again going to be a heavy price increase in Win4Lin, I
> > will have to consider whether Win4Lin is still a wise investment.
> >
> > Like I mentioned earlier, Win4Lin 2.0 runs fine for me, I only need
> > kernel 2.4x support. Not a new product.
> >
> > Grant.
>
> --
> Saska - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.noogie.com/~saska
>
> "He's an affable enough screen presence, but you'd be
> affable too if you could generate a lucrative movie
> career by copulating with baked goods."
> -Paul Tatara on Jason Biggs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Win4Lin-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
