I did a quick wiki page for the agenda at:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WINK/Architecture+Meeting+And+Agenda

<http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WINK/Architecture+Meeting+And+Agenda>Please
add anything you wish to discuss.  I added some initial goals in a somewhat
logical order (like short term goals first then choose architecture) that we
should discuss them.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <[email protected]>wrote:

> Thanks Dims,
>
> Since I called for the meeting, I'll take responsibility for getting the
> info for the meeting posted and for getting summaries documented and posted.
>
>
> -Nick
>
>
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> [email protected]
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> [image: Inactive hide details for Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>]
> Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>     *Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>*
>
>             06/18/2009 02:47 PM
>              Please respond to
>             [email protected]
>
>
>
> To
>
> [email protected]
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: Architecture Q&A Call
>
> Eli,
>
> The goal is to be as open as possible and post as many things as possible
> ahead of time, anything/everything to
> facilitate an off-line discussion and ensure broadest participation.
>
> * Any documents, please post URL's to wink-dev@ before the meeting (google
> docs or wiki or JIRA or anywhere else public
> is ok)
> * Come up with some sort of agenda items that needs to be discussed (this
> can be done on the wiki)
> * Set up a specific start/stop time for the meeting so everyone can plan to
> be there at least for that duration.
> * Please post the date/time of the IRC meeting, agenda and pointers to any
> documents.
> * Someone should volunteer to keep the meeting on track
> * Come up with proposals and possible solutions or action items for agenda
> items
> * Post all above in logical chunks to wink-dev@ and ask for closure on the
> mailing list. This helps people who cannot
> attend the IRC chat and still want to participate
> * When the chat winds down, please post the log to wink-dev.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
>
>
> On 06/18/2009 01:53 PM, Baram, Eliezer wrote:
> > Dim,
> > I'm new to IRC meeting and I try to figure out the right format that will
> make this meeting work.
> > I would call the meeting successful if valid questions will be raised
> during the conference and a discussion will be made.
> >
> > How do you recommend to run the IRC meeting ?
> >
> > If we were running the meeting In a conference call with an ability to
> share documents (by Google document for instance, or sent earlier by mail) I
> would format this meeting in a way where the contributors of the submissions
> would present their submission. These presentations would hopefully raise
> questions, and a discussion will be created. What can be an IRC alternative
> to this in order to trigger such discussion?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eli
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 5:57 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Architecture Q&A Call
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > Yes, please use IRC and post the transcript to the mailing list.
> >
> > No, you cannot make decisions on the IRC chat, you need to post what ever
> you are proposing on the mailing list and VOTE
> > on it (72 hours etc as usual)
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > On 06/18/2009 10:45 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> >> Jason, you (and anyone else for that matter) are absolutely invited,
> should
> >> have made that point clear.  I mentioned it on the list for exactly that
> >> reason though.
> >>
> >> I agree that calls are not typical for the Apache projects I've seen
> >> either.  But, it was proposed as a means to try to work through the
> issues
> >> quickly and to get everyone acquainted.  Most discussion will obviously
> >> happen on the mailing lists.  But, we need to come to a decision quickly
> on
> >> the base code as that's holding up any other work.  If the community
> would
> >> rather handle it via IRC then we can do that.  If done on IRC, do you
> just
> >> copy/paste the transcript somewhere for people to comment on later?
> >>
> >> Mentors, any suggestions here for how to have synchronous work sessions
> to
> >> get through discussions quickly?
> >>
> >> -Nick
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicholas Gallardo
> >> WebSphere  - REST&   WebServices Development
> >> [email protected]
> >> Phone: 512-286-6258
> >> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                Jason Dillon
> >>                <[email protected]
> >>                om>
>    To
> >>                Sent by: Jason            [email protected]
> >>                Dillon
>   cc
> >>                <jason.dil...@gma
> >>                il.com>
> Subject
> >>                                          Re: Architecture Q&A Call
> >>
> >>                06/18/2009 09:11
> >>                AM
> >>
> >>
> >>                Please respond to
> >>                wink-...@incubato
> >>                  r.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I think I can make that, if I'm invited of course.
> >>
> >> Though along those lines, typically "calls" aren't really used that
> >> much by the Apache community... IRC at times has even been a stretch,
> >> though I think many communities use it for regular group
> >> communications.  It may be construed as a bad sign if the first major
> >> discussion is effectively offline.  Perhaps if a transcript of the
> >> call was recorded somewhere, on this list, it might fly.  Otherwise
> >> it may be better from a community perspective to hold this meeting
> >> over IRC on freenode.net.  But I'm unsure, we'll let the mentors chime
> >> in more on this.
> >>
> >> I do think there needs to be more discussion on the merits of both
> >> codebases before a descison is made.
> >>
> >> Hope this helps...
> >>
> >> --jason
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:57 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> >>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be useful to have a call next week for some Q&A
> >>> regarding
> >>> the two runtimes and architectures.  We can have the relevant people
> >>> give
> >>> summaries of the work that's been contributed and then answer
> >>> questions.
> >>>
> >>> Given the geographic dispersion, getting a time nailed down will be
> >>> tough.
> >>> How does 8:00AM CST on Tuesday the 23rd work for everyone?
> >>>
> >>> -Nick
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nicholas Gallardo
> >>> WebSphere  - REST&   WebServices Development
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> Phone: 512-286-6258
> >>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> >>
>
>


-- 

- Bryant Luk

Reply via email to