Exactly.  As much as we try, wireless cannot be promised or guaranteed the same 
level of service as wired.  But as we've seen, people are often just as happy 
with a convenient service that works well 80% of the time, as an inconvenient 
(wired) service that works without issue almost 100% of the time.  In the 
residence halls, where we have pervasive wireless, we have significant issues 
associated with rouge devices.  We can do little to nothing except to locate 
and politely ask them to turn that off.  On our wired network we have pretty 
much total control.   So, just from an administrative point of view, we have 
little to no control over the medium for wireless, and almost total control on 
wired.  Kinda makes it difficult to be able to say the services are the same, 
or that we can offer the same SLA.  I guess you can say anything, but it 
doesn't make it true...

Ryan H Turner
Senior Network Engineer
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB 1150 Chapel Hill, NC 27599
+1 919 445 0113 Office
+1 919 274 7926 Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Thomas Carter
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 10:19 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiFi Service Level Agreement

I do not have the same confidence in wireless as I do wired. There is no 
control over the airwaves like there is over physical cabling, and some 
interference cannot be dealt with (like visitor's mobile hotspots).  

Thomas Carter
Network and Operations Manager
Austin College
903-813-2564

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hunter Fuller
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 5:40 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiFi Service Level Agreement

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Chuck Enfield <chu...@psu.edu> wrote:
> If so, why would we focus on saying, "wireless might not work."
> It's not helpful to us or our users.  A much more constructive 
> approach would be to tell faculty to plan for when wireless doesn't 
> work - to have a back-up plan for that iPad app, to download the 
> PowerPoint presentation before class begins instead of during class, 
> to plug into a wired connection if that's an option, etc..

The way I read this, it seems to imply a lack of confidence in the service. 
Since our wireless and wired infrastructures are separate to some degree, it's 
possible that a wireless connection would not work - but it's just as likely 
that a wired drop would not work, too.
Therefore, I'd estimate that I am equally confident in both services.

Maybe if it was phrased differently, like "make sure to test wired and wireless 
ahead of time, in case one fails" - but I see wireless and wired as equals.

Just my two cents.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to