I have seen testing on 4.0 BreezeAccess VL with 64 k packets where the new 4.0 outperformed version 3.1.25 by a very wide margin. Downstream throughput of 40.29 meg's per second with 59,952 frames per second passed! Data from 3.1.25 was 2.46 meg's and 3,662 frames per second. Most 5 GHz solutions I have seen tested are well below 3662 frames per second with 64k packets. Testing of 4.0 with and without internet has been very impressive. Brad
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:32 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] OT: about 70Mbps for under $6K We are running VoIP over a Mikrotik/NSTREAM 5Ghz OFDM solution. Actual TCP throughput is about 25Mbps, we have had over 12 VoIP across the PTMP and a PTP BH to our NOC were the VoIP service is located while providing INTERNET across. This is working with great success and Matt Liotta is providing us the internet link via a 100Mbps fiber. Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems www.wbisp.com 781-566-2053 ext 6201 1-888-wbsystem (888) 927-9783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Matt Liotta > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:25 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] OT: about 70Mbps for under $6K > > Never tried to put that many on a tower, but then again we don't use too > many towers. We've had 15 or so on a single roof before, but for the > most part we never really put more than 5 radios on the same structure. > We have over 100 roofs under contract, so we don't really need to load > up any single roof with too many radios. > > -Matt > > Travis Johnson wrote: > > > Matt, > > > > How do you fit more than 10-12 of those type of dedicated links on a > > single tower? > > > > Travis > > Microserv > > > > Matt Liotta wrote: > > > >> We rarely use multi-point systems for customers and when we do they > >> are either small businesses with very little voice and data needs or > >> they are just data customers. All of our customers with any > >> significant amount of voice are running on dedicated radios. I would > >> say our average customer buys 12 lines of voice and delivering that > >> over a Canopy backhaul works just fine. > >> > >> -Matt > >> > >> Patrick Leary wrote: > >> > >>> So you agree then that being able to do VoIP is key. I'd like to > >>> hear more > >>> about your experiences with VoIP. Is your solution actually doing it > >>> well or > >>> is that your idea of doing VoIP well is 8 only concurrent calls per > >>> sector > >>> so long as the quality is decent for those few calls? We have talked > >>> to many > >>> very users of other common 5GHz brands these past few week and we > >>> have been > >>> consistently told that performance is just dandy until you bump up > >>> against 8 > >>> calls. That is a less than 50 call per cell limit, which does not > >>> seem like > >>> enough to justify the investments needed on the NOC end for the > >>> softswitch. > >>> How do you define good VoIP performance Matt? > >>> > >>> Patrick Leary > >>> AVP Marketing > >>> Alvarion, Inc. > >>> o: 650.314.2628 > >>> c: 760.580.0080 > >>> Vonage: 650.641.1243 > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 16, > >>> 2006 6:47 AM > >>> To: WISPA General List > >>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] OT: about 70Mbps for under $6K > >>> > >>> Patrick Leary wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Matt, to further your comments that you see WISPs providing layer 2 > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> transort > >>> > >>> > >>>> for carriers. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We have multiple CLECs and non-CLECs buying layer 2 transport from > >>> us now. All are used to buy alternative access from fiber providers > >>> and therefore fixed wireless was a naturally next step. Further, > >>> almost all indicated they would have done it sooner, but the fixed > >>> wireless companies they approached weren't willing to offer them > >>> layer 2 transport. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> How about VoIP? How many of you consider VoIP to be an > >>>> important part of your service future as a WISP? If so, how do you > >>>> plan to > >>>> support since it cannot be done decently with the other popular 5GHz > >>>> solutions. That's not my opinion so much as the opinion of many larger > >>>> Trango and Motorola WISPs I have been talking to lately. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We are doing a significant amount of VoIP now. We have VoIP > >>> customers running on top of both Trango and Canopy radios. Canopy is > >>> a significantly better solution for VoIP since we can properly > >>> prioritize voice with Canopy, while we cannot with Trango. We also > >>> wholesale VoIP to other operators and help them --if they require > >>> it-- with getting their network ready to support VoIP. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> If a key goal of WISPs is growing ARPU, what are WISPs plans for > >>>> doing that > >>>> with whatever your current technology permits? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I believe VoIP is the number one way to grow ARPU and the fact that > >>> we bundle VoIP is why I believe we have one of the highest ARPUs in > >>> the industry. > >>> > >>> -Matt > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/366 - Release Date: 06/15/2006 > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/366 - Release Date: 06/15/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ **************************************************************************** ************* This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses (191). **************************************************************************** ************* **************************************************************************** ******** This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(43). **************************************************************************** ******** -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
