OK but you're complaining MT requires you prove you own the software while
Ubnt doesn't.  That's because MT can be stolen and Ubnt can not.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jan 9, 2013 6:45 PM, "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> wrote:

> No. Nor do I have Cisco iOS running on my own hardware.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 18:35, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> You have AirOS or that router software on your own x86 hardware?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Jan 9, 2013 6:30 PM, "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Oh. It's that license thing again. Another reason I don't like MikroTik.
>> With Uniquiti there are no license levels. You get what you purchased.
>>
>> On Jan 9, 2013, at 18:11, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Because a bunch of people run cracked copies...
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Jan 9, 2013 6:03 PM, "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> [email protected]?  Yes. You usually get a reply there. Asking you
>>> to supply your serial number.  As if I'd ask for support for a product I
>>> don't own.
>>>
>>> On Jan 9, 2013, at 17:15, Scott Lambert <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:04:18PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>> >> I've been using both MT and UBNT for many many years and I plan to
>>> >> use them both for many years. MT support has been almost completely
>>> >> absent, while UBNT typically answers fairly quickly. That said,
>>> >> usually when I notice a problem with my MT product, it's already been
>>> >> fixed in a newer release.
>>> >
>>> > MT support in their forum is hit and miss.  I get timely responses
>>> > from [email protected].  I don't understand the people who
>>> > complain on the forums that MT support is horrible and refuse to
>>> > e-mail [email protected].  I am not saying that Mike is one of
>>> > those guys.  I don't know if his statement is based on experience
>>> > with [email protected] or not.
>>> >
>>> > The east europe/western asia folks just seem to have a bit of a
>>> > different take on things than we in North America do.  I think
>>> > that's just due to the culture and language differences.  They tend
>>> > to come off as being a bit brusk to us.
>>> >
>>> > I don't trust any newly shipping product in a production environment.
>>> > They go into designated test environments.  The Edge Router may be
>>> > the best thing since sliced bread.  However, the devices I've used
>>> > the Quagga stack on have let me down more than the MikroTik routing
>>> > stack.  Of course, most of those Quagga devices were StarOS which
>>> > had its own problems.  Thankfully, we have completed our 100% StarOS
>>> > to 100% UBNT AP/backhaul radios with MikroTik routers transition.
>>> >
>>> > When I get an Edge Router, I will play with it on the desk.  Then
>>> > it will be put a nearby but small tower site.  If it behaves, I'll
>>> > put one on a non-leaf node tower.  I'm not in a hurry to get my
>>> > first EdgeRouter.
>>> >
>>> > Until then, I really like my 493Gs running 5.21.  We have not run
>>> > any production MikroTik wireless gear.  We just haven't.  We picked
>>> > up some Ubiquiti gear first.  No other reason.
>>> >
>>> > I have 6.0rc6 on the MikroTik in the house.  It has wireless.  It
>>> > works for my personal devices.  I wouldn't consider using RouterOS
>>> > 6 on customer use gear, yet.  Not even when they are calling it the
>>> > 6th release candidate.  It's not a release candidate if you are
>>> > still adding new features.  If you are still adding new features,
>>> > it is an alpha release...
>>> >
>>> > I have a couple of RB2011UAS units on the bench.  They aren't in
>>> > the field for the same reason I would not rush to put the EdgeRouter
>>> > in the field.
>>> >
>>> > UBNT and MikroTik both have software QA issues.  At this price
>>> > point, we get to be the alpha/beta testers.  C'est la vie.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Scott Lambert                    KC5MLE                       Unix
>>> SysAdmin
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Wireless mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to