Hi Joe,
Sorry, I missed your original message.
I've just taken a look at a list of stations that were active in the 2017
June 50MHz IARU Region 1 Contest. There were at least 30 stations with this
format of call sign. Over 3000 stations were active in this contest.
73,
Ian G0FCT
On 28 July 2017 at 20:44, Joe Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 7/28/2017 3:37 PM, Ian G0FCT wrote:
>
>> I think there is need to handle compound callsigns such as ZA/PA9XYX,
>> these call signs are common in Region 1.
>>
>
> Of course I know such callsigns are in use. The gist of my question was
> to ask "how many"? If you work 500 stations in a Region 1 VHF+ contest,
> would there be one or two? Ten? More?
>
> Also, there is a need in Region 1 VHF+ contests to exchange 6 character
>> locators (e.g. IO91OJ) rather than just 4 character locators. Is this
>> possible?
>>
>
> That was the main topic of my original message. Did you read it?? See
> below.
> -- Joe, K1JT
>
> On 28 July 2017 at 20:17, Joe Taylor <[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> One additional question I should have asked.
>>
>> If you think FT8 might get appreciable use in Region 1 VHF+
>> contests, would there be significant need for handling compound
>> callsigns such as ZA/PA9XYZ, etc.?
>>
>> -- Joe, K1JT
>>
>>
>> On 7/28/2017 2:49 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>>
>> Hi Palle (and other VHF+ contest enthusiasts in IARU Regioin 1),
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestions you posted to wsjt-devel concerning
>> VHF+ contest exchanges in EU.
>>
>> I have been sketching out some possible enhanced 75-bit message
>> structures for FT8 mode aimed (among other things) at supporting
>> your Region 1 contests.
>>
>> I would appreciate your comments on the following model contest
>> QSO structure based roughly on common HF contest practices:
>>
>> 1. CQ G4ABC IO91
>> 2. G4ABC PA9XYZ JO22
>> 3. PA9XYZ 590003 IO91NP
>> 4. G4ABC R 570007 JO22DB
>> 5. PA9XYZ G4ABC RR73
>>
>> The 4-character locators in messages 1 and 2 are redundant (and
>> anyway optional). But they cost nothing to include, and they do
>> provide some useful initial information.
>>
>> The first two digits of the exchanges in messages 3 and 4 are an
>> "RS" signal report. Because of the strong forward error
>> correction in FT8, the first digit will always be "5". The
>> second digit would be the FT8 S/N reading mapped onto a S1 to S9
>> scale, using 6 dB per S unit. Something like S1=-24, S2=-18, ...
>> S9=+24 dB.
>>
>> Is this an acceptable format for your Region 1 contest
>> exchanges? Do you think FT8 might be a popular mode for some
>> use in EU VHF+ contests?
>>
>> -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>>
>> On 6/30/2017 7:37 PM, Palle Preben-Hansen, OZ1RH wrote:
>>
>> FT8 sounds promising. Joe wrote:
>> /Three extra bits are available in the message payload, with
>> uses yet to be //defined. We have in mind special message
>> formats that might be used in //contests, and the like.
>> Your considered suggestions for use of these bits //are very
>> welcome!/
>> /
>> /
>>
>> 1. VHF contests in Europe needs the full 6 digit WWL
>> locator like
>> JO55*ul*. A QTH locator has always had 6 digits (or
>> more for
>> microwave), using only 4 digits comes from eme and has
>> spread to HF
>> 2. Many contests needs a report and a serial number like
>> 59*001* and
>> even sometimes a 4 digit serial number 59*1001* when
>> more than 1.000
>> QSO's has been worked in the contest
>> 3. Sometimes a state/area/membership/IOTA number or
>> similar free text
>> needs to be transmitted. Most contest exchanges can be
>> found in the
>> N1MM contest program https://n1mm.hamdocs.com
>>
>>
>> 73, Palle, OZ1RH.
>> www.oz1rh.com <http://www.oz1rh.com> <http://www.oz1rh.com>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>>
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
>> most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>>
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel