On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:31:16PM -0500, Andy Goth wrote: >On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 12:05 pm, Egbert Eich wrote: >> Daniel Stone writes: >> > I also hope like hell Mailman isn't munging Reply-To, because that's >> > just *wrong*. >> >> Hm, I don't know what you would call munging, it puts the list address >> into the Reply-To. > >Daniel is probably referring to: > >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
This comes up from time to time, and has been for years. There's no point rehashing that particular matter of personal preference again. If you want to force your own reply-to, you can. It only gets set to the list if you don't provide your own (this was broken, but has been fixed again). I'll continue to use mutt's 'l' reply method most of the time, which sends replies to the list regardless of how the reply-to is set. David -- David Dawes Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
