On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:42:05AM -0500, Andy Goth wrote: > On Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:12 pm, David Dawes wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:31:16PM -0500, Andy Goth wrote: > > >On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 12:05 pm, Egbert Eich wrote: > > >> Daniel Stone writes: > > >> > I also hope like hell Mailman isn't munging Reply-To, because that's > > >> > just *wrong*. > > >> > > >> Hm, I don't know what you would call munging, it puts the list address > > >> into the Reply-To. > > > > > >Daniel is probably referring to: > > > > > >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > > > This comes up from time to time, and has been for years. There's no > > point rehashing that particular matter of personal preference again. > > Sorry I brought it up... :^( I didn't mean to start anything. I just > happened to remember seeing the words "munge" alongside "reply-to" and > thought there might be a reference. I will not reply to this thread again.
Don't worry, Andy; it's me they're yelling at. :-) Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows -- Simon Slavin, on a.f.c _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
