Edgar Owen <Not only do almost all fossil creatures fall into rather
neat evolutionary sequences but so do living species fall into neat
related groupings (taxonomy) >
Taxonomy and Evolution are two different things. That creatures are
related by species is not the same as proving that one evolved from
the other.
> Your contention that any gap disproves evolution>
Your argument is based on faith. Gaps are holes that exist in the
theory. You want to believe something to fill in the gaps. That is
faith.
The sick thing is that every Evolution psychopath will not even
acknowledge the obvious, that if you cover a gap with what you THINK
should be there, that is as much faith as believing that Jesus came
back to life. It is something that cannot be proven with direct
evidence. Therefore it is your faith.
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
