Ok. Thanks, Chris Austin-Lane Sent from a cell phone
On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:08, "ED" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The core truth is I think I have much to say on the interesting points you > raised, but I just don't have the energy to do so. It others have thought on > those topics, and I believe k does, then I might join in with appropriate > comments. > > --ED > > > > --- In [email protected], "ED" <seacrofter001@...> wrote: > > > OOPS! Badly worded. > > What I meant was: > > "These issues are a huge can of worms I am unwilling to discuss for a > variety of reasons, but especially as I to not perceive a strong > connection of this topic to dharma, unless you convince me otherwise." > > --- In [email protected], Chris Austin-Lane <chris@...> wrote: > > > Sure, I wasn't trying to pry into your motivation, I apologize if I > did pry. I was merely disagreeing with your comment. > > Certainly it makes sense to be careful of your privacy when posting to > a public, recorded, forum. > > Thanks for your sweet email. > > > On Mar 7, 2011 10:41 PM, "ED" <seacrofter001@...> wrote: > > These issues are a huge can of worms I am unwilling to discuss for a > variety of reasons, but especially as I to not perceive a strong > connection to dharma, unless you convince me otherwise. > > > -----end quote > > Ha ha. Good one. > > > > > > >
