Anthony,

Try fear. That works for me.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@...> wrote:
>
> Bill,
>  
> Despite all your remarks, I need something to retard me from jumping from a 
> nine story building, other than cause-and-effect.
>  
> Anthony
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Bill! <BillSmart@...>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2012, 15:21
> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> friends & family react?
> 
> 
>   
> Anthony,
> 
> I don't consider myself 'more advanced' than you. In fact if anything I would 
> like to think I am 'less advanced' than you. In the case of zen practice the 
> more you unlearn and the less advanced you are from your Original Nature the 
> better.
> 
> I believe the concept of 'cause-and-effect' (like all concepts) is illusory. 
> ONE of the reasons I believe this is because the concept of cause-and-effect 
> is completely dependent upon the belief in a sequencial, serial, 
> uni-directional flow of time. Cause-and-effect requires at least two separate 
> actions, one - the cause- which happens before the other - the effect.
> 
> There is no sequencial, serial, uni-directional flow of time. There is only 
> an ILLUSION of a sequencial, serial, unidirectional flow of time. There is 
> only Now. The past exists only in our mind - we call this memory. The future 
> exists only in our mind as a logical projection(based on our belief in 
> cause-and-effect) of a concatenation of our illusion of Past and Now.
> 
> And, to employ the also equally illusory power of logic I can state: since 
> the flow of time itself is illusory any concept based on time must also be 
> illusory.
> 
> I hope this helps to retard you a little... 
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> >
> > Bill,
> >  
> > I agree you are much more advanced than I am, however I hope you will make 
> > your view on cause-and-effect more understandable.
> >  
> > Anthony
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2012, 10:09
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> > friends & family react?
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > Anthony,
> > 
> > You keep returning time after time to this theme. It seems self-destructive 
> > to me and I don't advocate what I'm about to say, but I say it only to 
> > respond to you.
> > 
> > There have been many intstances of people who have conquered their fear of 
> > pain and death. The first that comes to mind is Jesus, but there have been 
> > many others much less well-known or even known at all. Anyone that has 
> > chosen put his/her life at risk or face certain death could be said to have 
> > done this.
> > 
> > ...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > >  
> > > When can we break the illusion of self so that we don't fear 
> > > disintegration of our bodies?
> > >  
> > > However the cause and effect of leaping into an abyss and death still 
> > > exists, whether we are alive or dead.
> > >  
> > > Anthony
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > To: [email protected] 
> > > Sent: Friday, 13 January 2012, 17:28
> > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> > > friends & family react?
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > Anthony,
> > > 
> > > When we 'break the illusion of self' we break all illusions. We see 
> > > through all dualistic concepts.
> > > 
> > > ...Bill!
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Bill,
> > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > Jumping into an abyss is a classical zen allegory. It is a good one for 
> > > > the purpose of breaking illusion of the self. However, it is not for 
> > > > negating cause-and-effect. In the physical world, you don't jump into 
> > > > an abyss, because you don't want your body to disintegrate. In other 
> > > > words, there is an effect to fear. So it is not an illusion.
> > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > Anthony
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 12 January 2012, 12:51
> > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> > > > friends & family react?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ÃÆ'‚  
> > > > Anthony,
> > > > 
> > > > Zen stories, perhaps even more than most, are symbolic - many are 
> > > > allegories and should not be taken literally. I say zen stories use 
> > > > this device more than most because much of what zen is about cannot be 
> > > > totally expressed with words - espcially written words. Face-to-face 
> > > > dialog is better, but as you know some zen masters tried to express and 
> > > > communicate their experience of Buddha Nature without words - with just 
> > > > sounds or even just actions. At least that's my opinion.
> > > > 
> > > > The 'Jumping into the Abyss' phrase/allegory was taken from what you've 
> > > > called the physical world. When we stand at the edge of an abyss and 
> > > > contemplate jumping we will probably be terrified. It would take an act 
> > > > of either extreme desperation or faith to jump.
> > > > 
> > > > That is the same kind of desparation or faith that is needed to sever 
> > > > all attachements to the illusion of 'self' and rationality and throw 
> > > > yourself into the 'abyss' - Buddha Nature.
> > > > 
> > > > ...Bill! 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill,
> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > Quote:ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚  in zen stories as 
> > > > > 'leaping into the abyss'
> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > Since the physical world is part of the reality, can you do that 
> > > > > physically?
> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > Anthony
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012, 10:19
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
> > > > > your friends & family react?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚  
> > > > > Siska,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, the concept of cause-and-effect is illusory.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The belief in cause-and-effect is an attempt by your discriminating 
> > > > > mind to 'understand' reality, to 'make sense'of experience which is 
> > > > > fundamentally chaotic. It is a process of breaking up wholistic 
> > > > > experience (Just THIS!) into pieces, and then to categorize and even 
> > > > > directly associating some pieces with others by assigning a dependent 
> > > > > cause-and-effect relationship to these pairs or sets of pieces. The 
> > > > > establishment of these cause-and-effect relationships are done to fit 
> > > > > your needs at the time. They are not absolute, objective or real. 
> > > > > They are relational, subjective and illusory - this is because they 
> > > > > are dependent upon your dualistic concept of self/other. The illusion 
> > > > > of cause-and-effect helps you feel more comfortable and gives you a 
> > > > > certain sense of control of life.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The concept of karma is a spritualized version of cause-and-effect 
> > > > > which is usually thought of as purely a physical relationship.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The letting go of this illusion is sometimes referred to in zen 
> > > > > stories as 'leaping into the abyss', or 'taking a step off the 100-ft 
> > > > > flagpole'. These are teachings telling you that you must let go of 
> > > > > your attachments (espcially to logic and the belief in 
> > > > > cause-and-effect), come out of your fantasy comfort zone, throw away 
> > > > > your illusory security blanket and throw yourself completly into the 
> > > > > stark unknown and unknowable.
> > > > > 
> > > > > There's no comforting assurance of cause-and-effect there. Just THIS!
> > > > > 
> > > > > ...Bill! 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], siska_cen@ wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The killing is not the cause and the dieing the effect.
> > > > > > Would you then say that cause and effect is illusory?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Siska
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: "Bill!" <BillSmart@>
> > > > > > Sender: [email protected]
> > > > > > Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:18:32 
> > > > > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Reply-To: [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
> > > > > > your friends & family react?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Anthony,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > When I said 'outside agency' I meant 'outside of you' or 'other 
> > > > > > than you'. When you say 'karma functions by itself' you are 
> > > > > > implying that karma exists independently of you; like when you say 
> > > > > > 'not my will but Yours (God's) be done' you are implying that God 
> > > > > > exists independently of you. You are implying that 'karma' and 
> > > > > > 'God' are 'outside agencies' - outside of and/or separate from you.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I am saying that both the concept of 'karma' and 'God' and all 
> > > > > > their supposed attributes and associated powers/activites are NOT 
> > > > > > separate from you. That are created by you - by your discriminating 
> > > > > > mind. They are illusory.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If you kill, there is killing. If you are killed, you die. If you 
> > > > > > loot, there is looting. If you are looted, you loose property. The 
> > > > > > killing is not the cause and the dieing the effect. It is the same 
> > > > > > action viewed or described from two perspectives. It is Just THIS!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is my experience...Bill!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bill,
> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > The difference is that karma does not rely on God or any other 
> > > > > > > 'outside agent'. It functions by itself. On the other hand, if 
> > > > > > > you deny karma, does that mean whatever you do, whether killing, 
> > > > > > > looting or burning, does not have any effects? You may say you 
> > > > > > > rely on law to take care of it. But that is part of karma, at the 
> > > > > > > human level. Nevertheless, it is more realistic than reliance on 
> > > > > > > God. if all are illusory, killing and looting will be out of 
> > > > > > > control. In that case, believing in God is better than believing 
> > > > > > > in nothing.
> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > Anthony
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > > > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012, 13:00
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How 
> > > > > > > did your friends & family react?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > Anthony,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > How are they different concepts?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Both have to do with action/reaction (cause and effect), and both 
> > > > > > > exist as a concept in your mind.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Labeling some actions/reactions or cause/effect as good or bad 
> > > > > > > (good deeds lead to reward or sin leads to punishment; or 
> > > > > > > accumulation of [bad] karma leads to being re-born as a toad) is 
> > > > > > > just packaging. Likewise attributng the enforcement of 
> > > > > > > actions/reactions or cause/effect to an outside agency such as 
> > > > > > > karma or God is also just packaging.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It all looks the same to me - illusory, dualistic packaging.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > ...Bill! 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bill,
> > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > It is a different message you wrap in the same envelope.
> > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > Anthony
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > > > > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012, 9:15
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How 
> > > > > > > > did your friends & family react?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > Anthony,
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > You definition of karma is well stated, but why do you not 
> > > > > > > > think that definition could not also be applied to the 
> > > > > > > > Christian concept of sin/obedience and Hell/Heaven?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > For me it's the same message in a different envelope.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > ...Bill!
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That is not karma, but reward and punishment by God. Karma is 
> > > > > > > > > action and reaction by yourself through your own mind (or 
> > > > > > > > > Buddha nature).
> > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'…ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > > Anthony
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2012, 18:03
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, 
> > > > > > > > > How did your friends & family react?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'…ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > > Christians beleive in 'karma' also: if you're 'good' you go 
> > > > > > > > > to Heaven and if you're 'bad' you go to Hell...Bill!
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ItÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â 'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â¦ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'…ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ is
> > > > > > > > > >  not at all surprising that you got a funny reaction from 
> > > > > > > > > > people surrounding you when you said you were interested in 
> > > > > > > > > > Buddhism. Try doing the same thing with Moslems, and you 
> > > > > > > > > > get a
>  funnier response. Even in this forum, which is less hostile to Buddhism, you 
> find different views on it. 
> > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â 'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â¦ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'…ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > > > The key point in Buddhism is karma. But Hinduism also 
> > > > > > > > > > agrees to karma. The difference between the two is the 
> > > > > > > > > > former insists that karma is your own business, nobody else 
> > > > > > > > > > can help you change it. However, in Hinduism, there are 
> > > > > > > > > > powerful deities who respond to your requests and assist 
> > > > > > > > > > you. Don't forget we are a zen forum, and there are a view 
> > > > > > > > > > I term chaotic zen, which denies anything on karma, or any 
> > > > > > > > > > laws or rules. They say everything is in chaos. On the 
> > > > > > > > > > other hand, you will also hear all kinds of Buddhist views 
> > > > > > > > > > here. I hope you have fun here. 
> > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â 'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â¦ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'…ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > > > Anthony
> > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â 'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â¦ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'…ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â 'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â¦ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'…ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: dan_guzy <dan_guzy@>
> > > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, 7 January 2012, 16:08
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How 
> > > > > > > > > > did your friends & family react?
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â 'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Â¦ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'‚¬ÃÆ'Æ'…ÃÆ'‚¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'†'ÃÆ'Æ'¢ÃÆ'¢â€šÂ¬ÃÆ'…¡ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > > > I seem to be having trouble with this. I'm new to buddhism, 
> > > > > > > > > > just recently starting reading up on it the past several 
> > > > > > > > > > months, although technically I've been exposed to it for 
> > > > > > > > > > many years through a variety of tv shows, movies, etc. My 
> > > > > > > > > > favorite was Kung Fu: The Legend Continues. Don't know why, 
> > > > > > > > > > but the scenes with the shoalin temple and buddhist monks 
> > > > > > > > > > were always my favorite. 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Although I haven't come right out and said to my family 
> > > > > > > > > > (except for my sister) that I'm learning about Buddhism, 
> > > > > > > > > > they've seen the books and notes I leave to myself 
> > > > > > > > > > pertaining to it. So far, it has not been encouraging. They 
> > > > > > > > > > kind of give a disgusted look or a groan when they see it 
> > > > > > > > > > that suggests that they are not happy about it. They are 
> > > > > > > > > > catholics. I'm an atheist (which they've known for years). 
> > > > > > > > > > When I finally told my sister that I'd like to visit a 
> > > > > > > > > > temple in town, she got disqusted and said "why? You'll 
> > > > > > > > > > never go with me to my church, but you'll go to a buddhist 
> > > > > > > > > > church?" I didn't know what to say, so I told her the 
> > > > > > > > > > truth, that I didn't feel anything for catholicism anymore, 
> > > > > > > > > > and that it didn't feel like the right religion for me. She 
> > > > > > > > > > wasn't pleased.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Then today I was having a chat with a co-worker and boss at 
> > > > > > > > > > work. I get along great with both of them, known them for 
> > > > > > > > > > several years. My co-worker mentioned she and her husband 
> > > > > > > > > > were atheists, so I told her I was too. We both got a kick 
> > > > > > > > > > out of it realizing that we never knew that about each 
> > > > > > > > > > other. Then I mentioned to her that I had been reading up 
> > > > > > > > > > on buddhism lately, and she gave the same kind of groan 
> > > > > > > > > > I've been hearing from my family. My boss just sort of gave 
> > > > > > > > > > a look of shock and disbelief, didn't say anything. I 
> > > > > > > > > > couple of weeks or so before that, I was discussing various 
> > > > > > > > > > books with another boss that we like to read, and I 
> > > > > > > > > > mentioned one I'd been reading called the Peaceful Warrior. 
> > > > > > > > > > He asked what it was about so I told him, and when I 
> > > > > > > > > > mentioned it has a buddhist theme to it, he gave a funny 
> > > > > > > > > > look.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > What's funny about all of this is that I've always figured 
> > > > > > > > > > buddhism to be one of the most revered and highly respected 
> > > > > > > > > > forms of philosophy and religion on earth. Even growing up 
> > > > > > > > > > I felt that way. When I go online to Yahoo Answers R&S 
> > > > > > > > > > forum to ask a question pertaining to it, I haven't had any 
> > > > > > > > > > bad replies over a single question, and if any of you have 
> > > > > > > > > > ever been on there, you know they can be harsh sometimes in 
> > > > > > > > > > that section. So it really threw me for a loop seeing all 
> > > > > > > > > > these crazy reactions from people I know.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Did any of you get these same reactions from the people you 
> > > > > > > > > > knew when you were first learning about buddhism?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to