Anthony, I was thinking of the slow-motion martial art Tai Chi...Bill!
--- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@...> wrote: > > Bill, >  > Thai 'chi' also means an unordained nun. In that sense, of course, it is very > sterile. In the sense you refer to, i don't think it is sterilized, unless > you put antibiotic beforehand. >  > anthony > > > ________________________________ > From: Bill! <BillSmart@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, 15 January 2012, 16:28 > Subject: Re: [Zen] Illusory Concept > > >  > Anthony, > > 'Chi' is never unclean. In fact it is very sterile. > > I assume you're talking about Thai 'chi'. *** pun intended *** > > ...Bill! > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote: > > > > JM, > > à> > Can you see jumping from the top of a nine story building and getting > > killed is an act of 'emptiness'? > > à> > Anthony > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: 覺å¦â¢Ã§Â²Â¾Ã¦ËŽ <chan.jmjm@> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Sunday, 15 January 2012, 1:27 > > Subject: [Zen] Illusory Concept > > > > > > à> > Hi Ed,àIf I remember correctly, this is the second time that you have > > asked this question and it is an important one.àLet me address it again. > > > > In short, any attachment (insistence) of any concept, whether fore or > > against, is the act of our discriminating mind working in the concept and > > logic domain, which is emptiness by nature. In others dualistic, or > > illusory. > > > > Mike and Edgar both said in similar ways, "there is nothing except, > > majority is in the formless (96% is dark energy and dark matter)"àIn > > other words, all concepts, logic and words are emptiness by nature.àYet > > all are valid, because they all are there serving the universe for some > > reason. > > > > By asserting one is valid or not valid, we are discriminating, categorizing > > emptiness itself.à> > > > "Just This" is "ontological energy", is "chi", is "Buddha Nature", is "just > > sit", is "not thinking", is "...."àThey all serve the same purpose or > > objective, though they may differ in the detailed instructions. > > > > I trust most of the people in this forum emphasizes the fact "sitting", is > > an effective way to let our inner wisdom unfold, so that we could live in > > harmony.àAnd all discussions are really for awaking ourselves.àAll > > are valid.àAny instance or denial of any logic or concept is an > > "attachment to dharma".àDharma is everywhere and in every moment, > > (Diamond Sutra) > > > > In short, Chan is One.àOne is ALL.(Hsinhsin Ming)àUnless we "see" > > clearly all forms (logic, concept) are valid as well as invalid(empty), > > then we are not in sync with the wisdom of the universe.àIn other > > words, all "effects", though impermanent and emptiness by nature, exist for > > a reason. > > > > We strive to live a life "as is", accept "as is", then we see "cause and > > effect", as well as its "nature of emptiness".à> > > > jm > > > > > > On 1/14/2012 7:34 AM, ED wrote: > > à> > > > > > > > >Bill, > > > > > >To assert that 'cause and effect' is an illusory concept is dualistic - > > >and so is denial that the concept is illusory ??? > > > > > >Thanks, ED > > > > > >--- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Anthony, > > >> > > >> I don't consider myself 'more advanced' than you. In fact if anything > > >I would like to think I am 'less advanced' than you. In the case of zen > > >practice the more you unlearn and the less advanced you are from your > > >Original Nature the better. > > >> > > >> I believe the concept of 'cause-and-effect' (like all concepts) is > > >illusory. ONE of the reasons I believe this is because the concept of > > >cause-and-effect is completely dependent upon the belief in a > > >sequencial, serial, uni-directional flow of time. Cause-and-effect > > >requires at least two separate actions, one - the cause- which happens > > >before the other - the effect. > > >> > > >> There is no sequencial, serial, uni-directional flow of time. There is > > >only an ILLUSION of a sequencial, serial, unidirectional flow of time. > > >There is only Now. The past exists only in our mind - we call this > > >memory. The future exists only in our mind as a logical projection(based > > >on our belief in cause-and-effect) of a concatenation of our illusion of > > >Past and Now. > > >> > > >> And, to employ the also equally illusory power of logic I can state: > > >since the flow of time itself is illusory any concept based on time must > > >also be illusory. > > >> > > >> I hope this helps to retard you a little... > > >> > > >> ...Bill! > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
