Siska,

Nonsense, everything exists. It just isn't as it seems....

Edgar



On Jan 15, 2012, at 12:45 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> In this regards, "Nothing exists, no exceptions".
> 
> Siska
> 
> From: mike brown <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:29:18 +0000 (GMT)
> To: <[email protected]>
> ReplyTo: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> friends family react?
> 
>  
> Siska,
> 
>  Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is just 
> opinion. 
> 
>                                                                               
>                                 - Democritus
> 
> 
> Mike 
> 
> --- On Sat, 14/1/12, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> friends & family react?
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, 14 January, 2012, 23:17
> 
>  
> Hi Bill,
> 
> It took a while for me to figure this :-) I'm rather slow, perhaps lately, if 
> not always.
> 
> The idea that cause and effect is illusory is quite new to me. I remember 
> Anthony mentioning it before, but didn't really sink in. I thought the 
> concept of cause and effect is something that is parallel to dependent 
> origination, which is to say that everything is simultaneously affecting many 
> other things in such complicated manner that our mind cannot really grasp it. 
> Even if it can, it is actually of no use. As you said, the mind needs it to 
> 'feel' secure.
> 
> I never thought it as illusory though. Whatever we think about it IS illusory.
> 
> Siska
> 
> From: "Bill!" <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:19:25 -0000
> To: <[email protected]>
> ReplyTo: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> friends family react?
> 
>  
> Siska,
> 
> Yes, the concept of cause-and-effect is illusory.
> 
> The belief in cause-and-effect is an attempt by your discriminating mind to 
> 'understand' reality, to 'make sense'of experience which is fundamentally 
> chaotic. It is a process of breaking up wholistic experience (Just THIS!) 
> into pieces, and then to categorize and even directly associating some pieces 
> with others by assigning a dependent cause-and-effect relationship to these 
> pairs or sets of pieces. The establishment of these cause-and-effect 
> relationships are done to fit your needs at the time. They are not absolute, 
> objective or real. They are relational, subjective and illusory - this is 
> because they are dependent upon your dualistic concept of self/other. The 
> illusion of cause-and-effect helps you feel more comfortable and gives you a 
> certain sense of control of life.
> 
> The concept of karma is a spritualized version of cause-and-effect which is 
> usually thought of as purely a physical relationship.
> 
> The letting go of this illusion is sometimes referred to in zen stories as 
> 'leaping into the abyss', or 'taking a step off the 100-ft flagpole'. These 
> are teachings telling you that you must let go of your attachments (espcially 
> to logic and the belief in cause-and-effect), come out of your fantasy 
> comfort zone, throw away your illusory security blanket and throw yourself 
> completly into the stark unknown and unknowable.
> 
> There's no comforting assurance of cause-and-effect there. Just THIS!
> 
> ...Bill! 
> 
> --- In [email protected], siska_cen@... wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bill,
> > 
> > > The killing is not the cause and the dieing the effect.
> > Would you then say that cause and effect is illusory?
> > 
> > Siska
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Bill!" <BillSmart@...>
> > Sender: [email protected]
> > Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:18:32 
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Reply-To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> > friends & family react?
> > 
> > Anthony,
> > 
> > When I said 'outside agency' I meant 'outside of you' or 'other than you'. 
> > When you say 'karma functions by itself' you are implying that karma exists 
> > independently of you; like when you say 'not my will but Yours (God's) be 
> > done' you are implying that God exists independently of you. You are 
> > implying that 'karma' and 'God' are 'outside agencies' - outside of and/or 
> > separate from you.
> > 
> > I am saying that both the concept of 'karma' and 'God' and all their 
> > supposed attributes and associated powers/activites are NOT separate from 
> > you. That are created by you - by your discriminating mind. They are 
> > illusory.
> > 
> > If you kill, there is killing. If you are killed, you die. If you loot, 
> > there is looting. If you are looted, you loose property. The killing is not 
> > the cause and the dieing the effect. It is the same action viewed or 
> > described from two perspectives. It is Just THIS!
> > 
> > This is my experience...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > > Â 
> > > The difference is that karma does not rely on God or any other 'outside 
> > > agent'. It functions by itself. On the other hand, if you deny karma, 
> > > does that mean whatever you do, whether killing, looting or burning, does 
> > > not have any effects? You may say you rely on law to take care of it. But 
> > > that is part of karma, at the human level. Nevertheless, it is more 
> > > realistic than reliance on God. if all are illusory, killing and looting 
> > > will be out of control. In that case, believing in God is better than 
> > > believing in nothing.
> > > Â 
> > > Anthony
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > To: [email protected] 
> > > Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012, 13:00
> > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> > > friends & family react?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Â  
> > > Anthony,
> > > 
> > > How are they different concepts?
> > > 
> > > Both have to do with action/reaction (cause and effect), and both exist 
> > > as a concept in your mind.
> > > 
> > > Labeling some actions/reactions or cause/effect as good or bad (good 
> > > deeds lead to reward or sin leads to punishment; or accumulation of [bad] 
> > > karma leads to being re-born as a toad) is just packaging. Likewise 
> > > attributng the enforcement of actions/reactions or cause/effect to an 
> > > outside agency such as karma or God is also just packaging.
> > > 
> > > It all looks the same to me - illusory, dualistic packaging.
> > > 
> > > ...Bill! 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Bill,
> > > >  
> > > > It is a different message you wrap in the same envelope.
> > > >  
> > > > Anthony
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012, 9:15
> > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> > > > friends & family react?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > > Anthony,
> > > > 
> > > > You definition of karma is well stated, but why do you not think that 
> > > > definition could not also be applied to the Christian concept of 
> > > > sin/obedience and Hell/Heaven?
> > > > 
> > > > For me it's the same message in a different envelope.
> > > > 
> > > > ...Bill!
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > That is not karma, but reward and punishment by God. Karma is action 
> > > > > and reaction by yourself through your own mind (or Buddha nature).
> > > > >  
> > > > > Anthony
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2012, 18:03
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
> > > > > your friends & family react?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >   
> > > > > Christians beleive in 'karma' also: if you're 'good' you go to Heaven 
> > > > > and if you're 'bad' you go to Hell...Bill!
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ItÃÆ'‚ is not at all surprising that you got a funny 
> > > > > > reaction from people surrounding you when you said you were 
> > > > > > interested in Buddhism. Try doing the same thing with Moslems, and 
> > > > > > you get a funnier response. Even in this forum, which is less 
> > > > > > hostile to Buddhism, you find different views on it. 
> > > > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > The key point in Buddhism is karma. But Hinduism also agrees to 
> > > > > > karma. The difference between the two is the former insists that 
> > > > > > karma is your own business, nobody else can help you change it. 
> > > > > > However, in Hinduism, there are powerful deities who respond to 
> > > > > > your requests and assist you. Don't forget we are a zen forum, and 
> > > > > > there are a view I term chaotic zen, which denies anything on 
> > > > > > karma, or any laws or rules. They say everything is in chaos. On 
> > > > > > the other hand, you will also hear all kinds of Buddhist views 
> > > > > > here. I hope you have fun here. 
> > > > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > Anthony
> > > > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > From: dan_guzy <dan_guzy@>
> > > > > > To: [email protected] 
> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, 7 January 2012, 16:08
> > > > > > Subject: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
> > > > > > friends & family react?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ÃÆ'‚  
> > > > > > I seem to be having trouble with this. I'm new to buddhism, just 
> > > > > > recently starting reading up on it the past several months, 
> > > > > > although technically I've been exposed to it for many years through 
> > > > > > a variety of tv shows, movies, etc. My favorite was Kung Fu: The 
> > > > > > Legend Continues. Don't know why, but the scenes with the shoalin 
> > > > > > temple and buddhist monks were always my favorite. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Although I haven't come right out and said to my family (except for 
> > > > > > my sister) that I'm learning about Buddhism, they've seen the books 
> > > > > > and notes I leave to myself pertaining to it. So far, it has not 
> > > > > > been encouraging. They kind of give a disgusted look or a groan 
> > > > > > when they see it that suggests that they are not happy about it. 
> > > > > > They are catholics. I'm an atheist (which they've known for years). 
> > > > > > When I finally told my sister that I'd like to visit a temple in 
> > > > > > town, she got disqusted and said "why? You'll never go with me to 
> > > > > > my church, but you'll go to a buddhist church?" I didn't know what 
> > > > > > to say, so I told her the truth, that I didn't feel anything for 
> > > > > > catholicism anymore, and that it didn't feel like the right 
> > > > > > religion for me. She wasn't pleased.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Then today I was having a chat with a co-worker and boss at work. I 
> > > > > > get along great with both of them, known them for several years. My 
> > > > > > co-worker mentioned she and her husband were atheists, so I told 
> > > > > > her I was too. We both got a kick out of it realizing that we never 
> > > > > > knew that about each other. Then I mentioned to her that I had been 
> > > > > > reading up on buddhism lately, and she gave the same kind of groan 
> > > > > > I've been hearing from my family. My boss just sort of gave a look 
> > > > > > of shock and disbelief, didn't say anything. I couple of weeks or 
> > > > > > so before that, I was discussing various books with another boss 
> > > > > > that we like to read, and I mentioned one I'd been reading called 
> > > > > > the Peaceful Warrior. He asked what it was about so I told him, and 
> > > > > > when I mentioned it has a buddhist theme to it, he gave a funny 
> > > > > > look.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > What's funny about all of this is that I've always figured buddhism 
> > > > > > to be one of the most revered and highly respected forms of 
> > > > > > philosophy and religion on earth. Even growing up I felt that way. 
> > > > > > When I go online to Yahoo Answers R&S forum to ask a question 
> > > > > > pertaining to it, I haven't had any bad replies over a single 
> > > > > > question, and if any of you have ever been on there, you know they 
> > > > > > can be harsh sometimes in that section. So it really threw me for a 
> > > > > > loop seeing all these crazy reactions from people I know.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Did any of you get these same reactions from the people you knew 
> > > > > > when you were first learning about buddhism?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to