Merle, Buddha Nature is Just THIS! Only THIS! Nothing more. Nothing to know. Nothing to understand. Just THIS!
...Bill! --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote: > > > >  this just is?..merle >  > Merle, > > Then...Just THIS! > > ...Bill! > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote: > > > > > > > > àanthony ... my life is not dull... > > > > i àdo not wish to call friction BILL!.. > > why are you singling me out..? > > you in my books are the one who always begins the àfriction...à> > you will not accept... > > you just put your 2 bits in and me and àall must àsay yea bill! > > àor we are rapped over the knuckles with your so called stick.. > > more like an iron rod... > > think deeply and long... > > what do you want experience of the understanding of someone or text book > > analyses of zen... > > ài can do quotations too..regurgitate > > > > me thinks you are not zen enoughà> > you do not seem to be able to stand on your own 2 feet.. > > always harping back to some text book idea... > > àwhat if there were no textbooks > > àno masters of zen.. > > then you'd have to start from scratch eh?..à> > fresh original zen..eh? > > what then Bill! > > àmerle > > > > > > à> > Everybody needs entertainment to escape from dull life. > > à> > Anthony > > > > From: Bill! <BillSmart@> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Monday, 22 October 2012, 7:48 > > Subject: [Zen] Re: genius > > > > à> > Merle, > > > > I also understand why you want to cause friction on this forum. You want to > > be entertained. I have enough entertainment in my life outside of this > > forum. That's not what I'm looking for here. I'm looking for substantive > > discussions on zen. > > > > ...Bill! > > > > --- In mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ãâà> > > bill!..are you saying your zen practise is superior to edgar's zen > > > practise, eh?.. > > > tut tut.. Ãâàone man up manship games... > > > shame on you Bill!..you the enlightened one! > > > Ãâàmerle > > > > > > > > > Ãâà> > > Merle, > > > > > > Edgar could be a genius, but that won't help his zen practice...Bill! > > > > > > --- In mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàbill!..i can see where you are coming from and > > > > also where edgar is coming from..so where am i coming from? > > > > i can understand and relate to what you both are saying > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàgod father BILL!.. aldous huxley is a genius... > > > > ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâànext you'll be telling me your bored with leonardo > > > > da vinci > > > > ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàthe genius ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàare then not your > > > > cup of tea? > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàmaybe edgar is a genius? > > > > ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàmerle > > > > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > Merle, > > > > > > > > Edgar and I disagree on fundamental issues. In his post below I agree > > > > only with the first paragraph. The rest of > > it, which basically says some attachments are benign (actually, even > > necessary) and some aren't, I disagree with. And his last sentence "Zen is > > not as simple as many imagine!" is outright egregious. Zen is the most > > simple thing you can imagine. IMO Edgar makes is complicated by trying to > > UNDERSTAND and EXPLAIN it all the time. There is no need for, in fact IMO > > there is a need NOT TO, try to understand zen. > > > > > > > > You don't understand zen, you practice zen. > > > > > > > > My reading of the ISLAND has bogged down midway in Chapter 4. It seems > > > > very tedious and somewhat juvenile to me, but I'll keep going for at > > > > least another couple chapters to see what might come next. > > > > > > > > ...Bill! > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill!..what is it that you and edgar disagree on?... is this just > > > > > childish one up manship? > > > > > ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàas we are all ONE > > > > > ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàthen stands to > > > > > reason..edgar and you are still on the same coin so to speak > > > > > ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàhow is your island reading > > > > > going ? > > > > > ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàmerle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > Merle, > > > > > > > > > > I am 'listening' (reading actually), but there's nothing in this post > > > > > for me to learn, nothing new anyway. I already am aware of how much > > > > > Edgar and I disagree on zen - and I knew that already. > > > > > > > > > > ...Bill! > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester > > > > > <merlewiitpom@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàyes > > > > > > bill!..edgar is back.. > > > > > > edgar is on the cutting edge..are you listening?... and need i say > > > > > > learning?..merle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > > > > > > > Suresh, > > > > > > > > > > > > Attachment is a very valuable evolutionary survival mechanism. It's > > > > > > a fundamental part of human nature similar to what we share with > > > > > > other species. With no attachments individual humans would have no > > > > > > motivation or direction and would not survive. > > > > > > > > > > > > The > > problem is not attachments per se. We all use attachments every day to go > > about our lives successfully. That's what enables people to sustain > > material success in life. The problem is excessive attachment, or > > attachment to your attachments. The problem is excessive attachments THAT > > DO NOT MESH WITH WHAT IS REAL or > > attainable.ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > > > > > > > For example a man's attachment to THE IDEA OF an unattainable > > > > > > woman, or an unattainable position in society. Attachment to the > > > > > > unattainable causes > > > > > > suffering.ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > > > > > > > However attachment to the ATTAINABLE maintains physical and social > > > > > > life.ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > > > > > > > However things can change. When one loses something one was > > > > > > attached to realization demands changing one's attachment to it to > > mirror the new state of reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > Zen is not as simple as many imagine! > > > > > > > > > > > > Edgar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 20, 2012, at 1:38 AM, SURESH JAGADEESAN wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bill > > > > > > >Why do human liked to get attached? > > > > > > >What is the root cause for attachment? > > > > > > >Suresh > > > > > > >On Oct 20, 2012 8:38 AM, "Merle Lester" <merlewiitpom@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (merlewiitpom@) > > > > > > > Add cleanup rule | More info > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > >>ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàso > > > > > > >> how does one NOT be attached to these emotions eh?..merle > > > > > > >>ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Merle, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>No, these in-and-of themselves are not attachments. They are > > > > > > >>concepts (mental models), and in some case emotions - and it is > > > > > > >>not these that cause suffering. It is ATTACHMENTS to these that > > > > > > >>cause suffering. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>...Bill! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>--- In mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester > > <merlewiitpom@> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââ¬Â 'ÃÆ'Ã'ÃâÃÂ¢ÃÆ'ââââ¬à ¡ÃâÃÂ¬ÃÆ'ââ¬Â¦ÃâÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàthanks..are > > > > > > >>> they attachments?... merle > > > > > > >>> Merle, > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Love is not exactly the OPPOSITE of hate, but love/hate is a > > > > > > >>> dualistic pair - like good/bad, tall/short, hot/cold, yin/yang, > > > > > > >>> etc... > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> ...Bill! > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> --- In mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester > > > > > > >>> <merlewiitpom@> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââ¬Â 'ÃÆ'Ã'âââ¬Ã 'ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡ÃâÃÂ¢ÃÆ'Ã'ÃâÃÂ¢ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡ÃâÃÂ¬ÃÆ'Ã'âââ¬ÃÂ¦ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡ÃâÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââ¬Â 'ÃÆ'Ã'ÃâÃÂ¢ÃÆ'ââââ¬à ¡ÃâÃÂ¬ÃÆ'ââ¬Â¦ÃâÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâàtell > > > > > > >>> > me more BILLLL....... Love is it the opposite of hate????? > > > > > > >>> > merle > > > > > > >>> > ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââ¬Â 'ÃÆ'Ã'âââ¬Ã 'ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡ÃâÃÂ¢ÃÆ'Ã'ÃâÃÂ¢ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡ÃâÃÂ¬ÃÆ'Ã'âââ¬ÃÂ¦ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡ÃâÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââ¬Â 'ÃÆ'Ã'ÃâÃÂ¢ÃÆ'ââââ¬à ¡ÃâÃÂ¬ÃÆ'ââ¬Â¦ÃâÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'Ãâ 'ÃÆ'ââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦ÃÂ¡ÃÆ'Ã'âââÂ¬Ã Â¡ÃÆ'ââ¬Å¡Ãâà> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > I agree with James. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > As with all emotions like fear, anger, love, hate it is not the > > emotion that is the real problem, it is the ATTACHMENT to the emotion. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > ...Bill! > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > --- In mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com, "James W. Meritt" > > > > > > >>> > <JWMeritt@> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Not so sure getting rid of fear is a good thing. I see > > > > > > >>> > > having fear, but modifying how you use and react to it as a > > > > > > >>> > > good thing. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > James W. Meritt > > > > > > >>> > > CISSP, CISA, NSA IAM, PMP > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
