Edgar,

I'm disappointed in your characterization of Joe and me.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> Mike, Merle, Joe and Bill,
> 
> Only for "ordinary minds" is intellect not Zen and something "to be dropped".
> 
> For the realized mind intellect is used to solve real problems in the world 
> of forms in which we all exist like it or not...
> 
> Bill and Joe's basic PROBLEM is that they HAVE A PROBLEM. They don't really 
> seem to like the world they live in or feel at home in it. They want to 
> escape the world of forms; but first of all that's totally impossible while 
> they still live; and second of all to vainly attempt to escape the world of 
> forms is to escape realization instead.
> 
> Merle and myself on the other hand LOVE the world we live in. Merle and I 
> LOVE reality because we see how it continually manifests Buddha Nature in its 
> EVERY MINUTE DETAIL.
> 
> Merle and I love and accept reality. Bill and Joe reject it...
> 
> 
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 8:14 PM, mike brown wrote:
> 
> > 
> > The intellect is part of ordinary mind, as is being attached to emotions 
> > and believing in a self. This is the world of the conditioned and the 
> > relative. I know because I live there. It's not for want, or "lack", of 
> > anything that takes us beyond, but the dropping of these things.
> > 
> > From: "yonyonson@..." <yonyonson@...>
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Sent: Friday, 26 October 2012, 0:47
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
> > 
> >  
> > > There's no need to speculate whether we are always aware, or not. We just
> > > are. Of course, some are not aware that we are always aware. Funny you
> > > should put me in that camp, but there you are...
> > 
> > yes, a need to or not does not interfere with your speculation. ;-)
> > 
> > "We just are" Can you feel it in your zen bones?
> > 
> > it makes no difference to me, but when you use expressions like "going
> > beyond" there must be a lacking, a goal, call it what you like.
> > 
> > hongyeongsoo
> > 
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: "yonyonson@..." <yonyonson@...>
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2012, 23:53
> > > Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>>does a door-post lack anything?
> > >>
> > >> Well, you've just answered your own question by asking me and not the
> > >> door-post.
> > >
> > > i ask you because you seem to think so or not so.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>more than enough awakened persons have stated, "Awakening chooses
> > >> you"; not the other way around.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> That's only one side of the dualistic coin (tariki = outside help; other
> > >> power). The other side is of the coin is Jiriki (Awakening brought about
> > >> by
> > >> one's own self power/effort). They're not mutually exclusive, btw.
> > >
> > > tariki/jiriki...huh? outside of scriptures and/or japanese language.
> > > show me please...
> > > also, "outside(tariki)/inside(jiriki)"? of what? WHO?
> > >
> > >>
> > >>> No conditions.
> > >>
> > >> You could say that Buddha Nature is the Unconditioned, but what prevents
> > >> a
> > >> person in a coma from becoming Awakened in this very moment?
> > >
> > > i don't know
> > >
> > >>
> > >>>"beyond intellect into intuition and awareness"? have you been there?
> > >>
> > >> Who hasn't been there? Who isn't there now? Even when you're in the
> > >> middle
> > >> of a grievous argument your awareness of being doesn't disappear.
> > >
> > > reminds me of Zuigan's morning question, "Master, Master, are you
> > > awake? are you Super Awake?" okay, so no problems? what are you
> > > aspiring towards?
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>or are you just speculating?
> > >>
> > >> What do you think?
> > >
> > > yes.
> > >
> > > hongyeongsoo
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Mike
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: "yonyonson@..." <yonyonson@...>
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2012, 19:34
> > >> Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> does a door-post lack anything?
> > >>
> > >> more than enough awakened persons have stated, "Awakening chooses
> > >> you"; not the other way around. No conditions.
> > >>
> > >> "beyond intellect into intuition and awareness"? have you been there?
> > >> or are you just speculating?
> > >>
> > >> hongyeongsoo
> > >>
> > >> "zazen is good for nothing"
> > >>
> > >> On 10/24/12, mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
> > >>> In Edgar's defence, try telling a door-post, or a one day old baby, or a
> > >>> person in a coma - "Just This" - and see if they Awaken. So the
> > >>> intellect
> > >>> is
> > >>> needed to both live and set the conditions for awakening, but toreally
> > >>> live
> > >>> we have to go beyond the intellect into intuition and awareness. 2 plus
> > >>> 2
> > >>> =
> > >>> 4. But what does 4 equal?
> > >>>
> > >>> Mike
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ________________________________
> > >>> From: Joe <desert_woodworker@...>
> > >>> To: [email protected]
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2012, 23:26
> > >>> Subject: Re: [Zen] original zen
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Group, & Edgar,
> > >>>
> > >>> I did my level best to draw Edgar out, but to Noah Veil.
> > >>>
> > >>> I inscribe my Gatha in sorrow, with regret and apology to all.
> > >>>
> > >>> To Edgar:
> > >>> -- -----
> > >>> Stubbornness does not Compassion show;
> > >>> Nor Self-Protectiveness quicken the Slow.
> > >>> One-up-man-ship
> > >>> Did never steal THIS show.
> > >>>
> > >>> Generosity and consideration
> > >>> Are a far more wholesome ration.
> > >>> But Clarity, Honesty, and help,
> > >>> Come not from a whelp.
> > >>>
> > >>> To raise a point and then depart
> > >>> Is the misplaced throwing of a dart.
> > >>> To live to lie another day,
> > >>> is the cellulose Philosophy of a bale of Hay.
> > >>>
> > >>> --J. Guo-Xiang Tennen M.
> > >>>
> > >>>> Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> REALITY, THE WORLD OF FORMS, as I just said!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to