Bill,

Bill is finally getting it right. Here he speaks not of dropping illusions but 
as seeing illusions AS illusions. That's what I've been trying to say to him 
for a long time. 

Edgar




On Oct 28, 2012, at 7:11 AM, Bill! wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> It's certainly not a command and not really a suggestion.
> 
> IMO...
> 
> In order to become aware of Buddha Nature for the first time (kensho_ people 
> have to 'stop' or 'halt' their discriminating mind (intellect and source of 
> illusions). This is the purpose of all zen teaching techniques such as koans, 
> chanting, bowing, kinhin (walking mediation), samu (mindfulness work detail) 
> and even zazen (shikantaza). After that these techniques are used to deepen 
> and integrate the experience of Buddha Nature into all phases of daily life 
> including the reappearance of the discriminating mind, rationality, illusions 
> and all - but now these are seen as illusions and applied/accepted without 
> attachments.
> 
> I don't know why I used the term 'drop' there, but I think I was echoing 
> something said in the post to which I was replying.
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
> >
> > Bill!,
> > 
> > >Drop the mind 
> > 
> > 
> > Is that a command or a suggestion? To be honest, I don't think either are 
> > possible. That'd be like satori or demand. I see dropping the mind as a 
> > kind of 'grace' rather than something you can 'do'. Who was it here (I 
> > think it was Chris) who quoted someone who said something similar? To 
> > paraphrase, 'If Enlightenment is an accident, then zazen makes us 
> > accident-prone'. 
> > 
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bill! <BillSmart@...>
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Sent: Sunday, 28 October 2012, 9:16
> > Subject: [Zen] Re: if one looses one's mind can one still experience zen?
> > 
> > 
> > Â  
> > Merle,
> > 
> > Lots to cover...I've embedded my responses in the body of your text...
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > bill!..
> > > so what is it exactly what you are attempting to tell me Bill!...
> > Just THIS!
> > 
> > > by the way having to add an exclamation mark is very painful..
> > > means i have to do shift.....that's not my style..
> > > so it will have to be billllllllll......
> > >  hey looks like a bar code on the grocery item eh?
> > 
> > A little...
> > 
> > >  billllllllllllllllllll.....................
> > >  so you have told me over and over again we must all have 
> > > instructions..
> > > well hallo billlllllllllllllll with the bar code name...
> > > i am the teacher...
> > > how many times have i hinted at this and you do not believe me!...
> > 
> > I didn't count them. Many times. 
> > 
> > >  don't you have faith in me?..
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > > don't trust me?
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > > sensual ..mmmm interesting..
> > > i was of the understanding through realisation and your most power packed 
> > > instructions 
> > > that we must under all costs detach ourselves from the senses... 
> > > as they are attachments and can hinder realisation?..
> > 
> > Absolutely not. Do not detach yourself from your senses. They are how you 
> > experience. They are the gateway to Buddha Nature. 
> > 
> > > so what are we left with mind!...
> > 
> > Drop the mind and you are left with only senses - only experience - Just 
> > THIS!
> > 
> > > do you hate your mind?
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > >  somewhere along the track you feel mind is a hinderance and must not 
> > > be tolerated!..
> > 
> > ATTACHMENT to the mind is a hindrance to realizing Buddha Nature, not the 
> > mind itself.
> > 
> > > look at this way if one looses one's mind through an illness can one 
> > > still experience zen?
> > 
> > You don't EXPERIENCE zen, you PRACTICE zen. You EXPERIENCE Buddha Nature. 
> > And yes, anyone that is able t
> 
> 

Reply via email to