Edgar,

The experience of what you'd later call 'mistaking a rope for a snake' is an 
act of perception.  Your experience is not what alarms you, it's your 
perception.

It's the very same at a magic show. It's not experience that fools you, it's 
your perception of experience that fools you; and that is a very good analogy 
for EVERYTHING you perceive and believe - like scientific 'facts'.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> Mike,
> 
> Funny! Because Bill's (and now apparently your) "just this" at night would 
> have been the snake that was really a piece of rope!
> 
> That's why "just this" JUST doesn't cut it. I can imagine Bill at the magic 
> show yelling "just this" as every illusion is performed believing they are 
> all real because they are his direct experience!
> 
> By claiming the immediate experience of "just this" is reality you mistake 
> illusion for reality..... In the cases above it's obvious, but if you 
> understand the biology of perception you understand it happens EVERY TIME....
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:50 AM, uerusuboyo@... wrote:
> 
> > Edgar,
> > 
> > There many gold standards for what reality is, but surely what we 
> > experience as humans is all we have to go on? If I see a snake at night, 
> > how I react at that time is far more important than in the morning 
> > realising it was just a piece of old rope. 
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > 
> > From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...>; 
> > To: <[email protected]>; 
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... but how 
> > plain is that? 
> > Sent: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 1:29:39 PM 
> > 
> >  
> > Bill,
> > 
> > 
> > The point is that Bill's "just this" is something produced by complex 
> > sensory and cognitive processes. It does NOT correspond to raw reality as 
> > he would have us believe. It's the RESULT of a very complex sequence of 
> > processes.
> > 
> > That's why Bill's just this is actually "just this ILLUSION mistaken for 
> > reality"....
> > 
> > True you don't experience reality like this. Because you ARE NOT 
> > EXPERIENCING REALITY AT ALL!
> > 
> > Edgar
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:14 AM, uerusuboyo@... wrote:
> > 
> >>  
> >> Edgar,
> >> 
> >> But you don't experience reality like that. Do you have to understand the 
> >> endocrine system to take a pee?
> >> 
> >> Mike
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> >> 
> >> From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...>; 
> >> To: <[email protected]>; 
> >> Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... but how 
> >> plain is that? 
> >> Sent: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 12:58:56 PM 
> >> 
> >>  
> >> Bill,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> That's very bad biology. There are 3 general stages involved. Raw sensory 
> >> experience which occurs separately in each different sense organ. There is 
> >> considerable pre-processing there where eg. edges and motion are 
> >> preferentially detected. 2nd there is perception in the optic lobes, 3rd 
> >> the brain itself makes what is perceived into objects in the context of 
> >> one's internal model of reality.
> >> 
> >> You can't just make things up that are contrary to the way biology 
> >> actually works...
> >> 
> >> Edgar
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Bill! wrote:
> >> 
> >>>  
> >>> Edgar,
> >>> 
> >>> What's causing confusion is you continue to look at experience only from 
> >>> a pluralistic POV. From a pluralistic POV there is a distinction between 
> >>> sight, sound, taste, smell and touch. From a monistic POV there is no 
> >>> distinction. It's just experience. Experience is only separated into the 
> >>> different senses when pluralism arises along with perception. It's then 
> >>> that you see, hear, taste, smell and touch. Before pluralism there is 
> >>> just experience - Just THIS!
> >>> 
> >>> It doesn't matter if my perception is different (worse or better - like 
> >>> eyesight or hearing) than yours. For example blurry vision doesn't 
> >>> produce a different experience than clear vision. The vision being blurry 
> >>> or clear is a perception, not an experience. The same goes for vision and 
> >>> touch. If a person is blind but can feel then they are sentient and do 
> >>> experience; BUT a blind person or deaf person does not have the same 
> >>> perception as a person who sees and hears well.
> >>> 
> >>> ...Bill!
> >>> 
> >>> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > So why is the experience of you different from someone who needs 
> >>> > glasses, or a blind person?
> >>> > 
> >>> > Which has the 'true' experience of the 'true' reality?
> >>> > 
> >>> > Which is the true 'just this' when you have 3 different just thises?
> >>> > 
> >>> > Edgar
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > On Jul 7, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Bill! wrote:
> >>> > 
> >>> > > Edgar,
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > Experience (awareness of the 'real world') is not dependent upon 
> >>> > > eyeglasses, corneas or eyes. It is however dependent upon what we 
> >>> > > call senses. If you were not sentient then you could not experience 
> >>> > > and would have no awareness.
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > There would be nothing.
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > ...Bill!
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Panda,
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > Good point. Which is the REAL world Bill. With or without glasses? 
> >>> > > > With or without corneas? With or without eyes?
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > After all reality does NOT consist of focused light images of 
> >>> > > > 'things'....
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > Edgar
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > On Jul 7, 2013, at 1:43 AM, pandabananasock wrote:
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > > Are you wearing glasses right now?
> >>> > > > > Can you see the frames in your periphery?
> >>> > > > > Did you see them before I asked?
> >>> > > > > 
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > 
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to