At 10:03 AM 9/29/2002, Marc wrote:

>I have both the pre-1980 and post-1980 versions of the Bible. The newer one is
>large print, which I can use for teaching. But I keep the older one because it
>was a particularly nicely bound type that they don't seem to make anymore 
>(real
>calfskin) and it was a gift from my mother as I was headed off down the road
>south to Salt Lake and Provo. It's got a lot of scripture marking in it, and I
>tend to remember things visually, so I'll often prefer the older one for that
>reason. Just call me a sentimental old fogey.
>
>--
>Marc A. Schindler

Same here. Also, even though the "post-1980" version had excellent 
footnoting there were still some footnotes in the "pre-1980" version which, 
imo and in some respects, was better than the "post-1980 version. Does 
anyone know of a LDS study bible in existence--or even an excellent non-LDS 
study bible?



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to