At 10:03 AM 9/29/2002, Marc wrote: >I have both the pre-1980 and post-1980 versions of the Bible. The newer one is >large print, which I can use for teaching. But I keep the older one because it >was a particularly nicely bound type that they don't seem to make anymore >(real >calfskin) and it was a gift from my mother as I was headed off down the road >south to Salt Lake and Provo. It's got a lot of scripture marking in it, and I >tend to remember things visually, so I'll often prefer the older one for that >reason. Just call me a sentimental old fogey. > >-- >Marc A. Schindler
Same here. Also, even though the "post-1980" version had excellent footnoting there were still some footnotes in the "pre-1980" version which, imo and in some respects, was better than the "post-1980 version. Does anyone know of a LDS study bible in existence--or even an excellent non-LDS study bible? -- Steven Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED] ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
