After much pondering, Elmer L. Fairbank favored us with:
It seems to me that an honest scholar would just stick to writing things he can authenticate using the documentary record, or at least the archaeological record. In the absence of such records the author isn't just engaging in unfounded supposition, he is engaged in irresponsible guessing and wild speculation. That is, he is just making up the story. Such a book is fiction, not nonfiction.
Ah, yes, but now it becomes part of the scholarly record, to be quoted ad nauseum, with the wild speculation becoming more and more a concrete truth with every scholarly citation.
Exactly!  I can see that we are singing from the same hymnal.


John W. Redelfs                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=============================================
To me, clowns aren't funny.  In fact, they're kind of scary.
I've wondered where this started and I think it goes back to
the time I went to the circus, and a clown killed my dad.
--Jack Handy
=============================================
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to