[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that's one of the reasons I suggested having dladm(1M) be the
place to display this information since it's where links are
administered in general, even the ones that will be handed off to
If we want any form of internal consistency, wouldn't we also need to
change were we assign datalink names from zonecfg to dladm?
Thus no more 'net' resource in zonecfg for exclusive-IP zones, but
dladm set-zone zoneA bge1
Only having dladm show it, and not be able to affect it, seems quite
*If* we believe that this is the right way to go, aren't we opening up
pandoraz box to pull out more and more from zonecfg?
I'm failing to understand the architectural or design principle that
underlies your suggestion.
zones-discuss mailing list