As far as I can tell from my experiences at work, the answer is somewhere in
between. Yes it acts on all User Folders below the folder containing the CC,
but it seems to get a little confused if the DTML scripts (Or at least some
of them) are not in the same folder with each UF.
Not fully tested as I say, but it is annoying. Didn't there used to be a UF
be added to the basic UF API, to extend all UF's rather than adding an
acquirable object that we might rather not acquire. Surely the nature of the
logon method should be governed by some or all of the following:
1) The site designers wishes.
2) The browsers ability to do Basic Auth properly (Or at all).
3) The users preference (This might be undesirable in some cases).
The difficulty of tactical maneuvering consists in turning the devious into
the direct, and misfortune into gain.
- Sun Tzu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Behrens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christian Theune" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Cookie Crumbler and similar products (Re: Zope 2.6
> Christian Theune wrote:
> > Hmm. I didn't get an answer right now (well i don't find the question
> > if the cookie crumbler would interfere subfolders (distor through
> > or would only be active on a "sibling" userfolder, which he is
> I'm really not sure. I imagine it could be troublesome.
> Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -