On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: | >- The packages in "z" can be used for more than just Zope | | +2
So, here's an idea: - Move component-architecture packages out of 'zope' into 'ca', and then we don't have the 'zope' vs 'Zope' issue anymore. I've been using stuff from 'zope' (except 'zope.app') for a win32 app *wink*. So, what about this: zope.component zope.interfaces (?) zope.configuration zope.testing zope.schema (soon-to-be-dead?) - All move to 'ca.*' zope.app.* - Move down to 'zope'. This is pretty rough. Probably there are more stuff that should move to 'ca', and some stuff which should be grouped into packages, so that 'zope' doesn't get excessively broad. -- Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://awkly.org - dreamcatching :: making your dreams come true http://plone.org/about/team#dreamcatcher Breadth-first search is the bulldozer of science. -- Randy Goebel _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
