Previously Andreas Jung wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 23.03.2009 14:26 Uhr, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > This is an important point. As I see it the KGS is a Zope-only thing,
> > and is just a workaround for the mindless behaviour of setuptools. I do
> > not see it gaining acceptance outside of the Zope community, and imho
> > effort is better spent on improving the packaging tools.
> Are there other Python projects that have to deal with such a huge
> amount of packages and dependencies? I don't know any similar project.
> So the solution must come from the Zope world (which does not mean that
> we participate in the packaging toolchain development as Tarek does).
I don't know. I just feel quite strongly that improving the packaging
tools would be a better use of manpower than working on the KGS in its
Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -